iwanttobehappy2022

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j65g919 wrote

Yes. Just give us here at Yankee your address so we can bill you or put on a lean on your property to cover the consultation we just gave you. Be humble, say yes to whatever your boss asks at work and realize the more hours you get to work at yankee the better you feel as a person

2

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5uxpc5 wrote

You are very lonely and a weird person lol. Using 2 accounts to harass me for supporting the expansion of bc access in our state…simply because I stated pharmacists at chain pharmacies are spread too thin and voiced I would like women to be provided greater and more private access to doctors? Really weird man. Then you claim I didn’t read the short ass article, which I did and summarized it. Im not sure if you are mentally all there but you don’t seem okay nor have you made a logical point. What’s more bizarre, it seems you have read a completely different article and you seem to misreading my comments. I hope you stabilize.

You want birth control to be available without a prescription, fine but that’s not what this proposal is about. You keep restating, pregnant in capital letters which again is odd.

Hope for the best for you sir. If you want to start taking birth control or get an abortion, have at it, have fun. Best of luck bro!

And maybe the other oddly hyper aggressive commenter and you can become friends and go outside touch grass interact. Seek drug and mental health treatment.

0

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5uldi2 wrote

Define fewer risks. Are they known or unknown risks by the general public? Quantify that and compare them to me. Second, this bill does not remove the need for a prescription. If CVS had an aprn or doctor or pa on staff to write the scripts, review medical history, answer questions and ask some questions to make sure every is okay…I’m fine with that.

−1

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5ujtc8 wrote

I’m very confused. No clue what article you read but what was proposed is letting pharmacists write scripts for birth control pills. There is a provision in the bill that allows aprns and pa’s to preform suction abortions. APRN’s and PA’s are not pharmacists. They don’t work behind the counters at the pharmacy. It had nothing to do with my comment about how cvs and Walgreens understaffing their pharmacies. Nor did I say I was against abortion or against increasing access to birth control. I just said it would be better to increase women’s access and privacy to primary care doctors instead having the busy pharmacist write scripts because it would reduce chances of very rare but possible side effects.

0

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5u9a05 wrote

Yeah I did. I’m talking how cvs and Walgreens staff their pharmacies, they’re usually understaffed as is. It’s just allowing pharmacists to write scripts for birth control pills. I’m saying people should be an established patient with a pcp doctor at the least to mitigate rare but possible side effects or complications. But if this helps I’m for it.

0

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5u5y8a wrote

Yeah actually. You can go into bad withdrawals if you suddenly stop an ssri or snri.

I don’t understand your point? I’m saying the pharmacists are swamped as is and probably shouldn’t be writing scripts in between playing catch up filling orders. While I support greater access to birth control, a person should be seen by a doctor, specialist or aprn (people with the right education and experience and know the patients medical history) to make sure that it’s safe for the patient to go on birth control.

The issue is women’s ability to have access and to establish/maintain patient doctor relationship (I’m saying they are a recurring patient to the same doctor and that doctor is taking ownership of their care) for pcp, specialists etc….in private without their parents, partners, family, whoever having input or knowledge of them seeking birth control.

The other issue is privacy for teens on their parents or guardians health insurance or adults on their parents…usually after each medical appointment a bill or statement goes to who ever has the policy.

3

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j5u2fjd wrote

I don’t own Walgreens or CVS. Why are you telling me to hire people for a company I don’t own? CVS it’s already a nightmare to actually talk to the pharmacist. It’s usually one or rarely two pharmacists with not enough techs and a huge line of customers. CVS and Walgreens won’t even give a window for when they will get medication delivered if it’s on back order nor will they look up other stores’ inventories to tell you where to fill your script.

1

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j4xvh0k wrote

I will add that a lot of old people that when they come to the point in which they no longer live independently on their own, do not want to spend their money and wealth they want to pass on independent/assisted living or convalescent home. Those places are hella expensive. In my experience, it’s taken their family members to have many conversations to convince them that they (their family) don’t need their wealth and that they should spend it on living at a place in which they can get the care they need and live comfortably. The older person takes even more convincing if their kids or grandkids wish to pay for their independent/assisted living or convalescent home. Add in the fact, no one wants to need to get help bathing or wiping. No one wants to move out of their home and give up the freedom they had their entire adult lives. It sucks.

I could see an older person trying to get a diagnosis to get dying assistance to avoid having to go to a living facility or home. To be honest I probably would.

1

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j4xrxke wrote

So this would exclude those with dementia or Alzheimer’s because the illness usually has progressed to the point that it’s observable by them, their family, and doctors. Because it affects their ability to think and process information a long with their behavior…I would imagine they would not be competent to make the decision.

What about someone that in old age declines like loosing the ability to walk or vision, and no longer can take care of themselves (like dress themselves, clean themselves after the bathroom and bath), they wouldn’t be able to get assistance? What about someone with RA or tinnitus? What about someone that’s hella old, all their friends are dead along with their spouse, physically are declining and wishes to pass on which their family knows about and supports?

What about someone young that finds out they will 100 percent develop a terminal illness and wishes to pass on before symptoms appear?

1

iwanttobehappy2022 t1_j4doxzs wrote

That’s moronic. You would still be dead in that scenario or at the very least in a serious crash. I’d rather been an adult and not die or have to deal with all the aftermath of a crash then to act like a 7 year old with poor social skills thinking being right is the most only thing that matters even though I put myself in danger or my car is wrecked. Check your ego and let the crazies pass.

1