I wouldn't even consider Carmack and Altman leading experts in the field of AI. The real experts are the researchers authoring papers.

24 hour charge would be ideal but being able to fully charge in 9 minutes is still pretty insane.

This is how I'm coping lol. I'm gonna pretend the first episode starts with this massive final battle and cuts right as some crew members land in the ring.

Yeah that's my best guess. Perhaps reddit wants more interactivity and less upvote read a few a comments and move on type behavior.

Funny you mention those 2 subs because I'm subbed to neither yet they've been frequently popping up in my feed. Hell one of the threads even got me to start watching "The Expanse" you might be onto something.

Pretty much where I stand on the matter. Like yeah, bots are everywhere and undeniably are used in an attempt to manipulate public opinion, but Occam's razor comes first. AI terms have been blowing up on google trends these past few months there's no big conspiracy to 1984 your opinion of AI lmao.

Well it did make you post. These systems aren't exactly looking ahead they just want the max amount of engagement at any given time.

As for that edit they don't push the most popular posts they push posts that have the highest change of retaining your attention. At many social media sites (maybe reddit but idk), those recommendations are unique to each user based on the absurd amount of data they collect. Only a few engineers at reddit would know for sure.

How do you know bots are upvoting AI stuff?

Congratulations! you've just discovered **Algorithmic Recommendation Systems**. Behind the scenes, Reddit and every other social media website takes note of the rate of engagement and recommends only the most likely posts to get you to interact. Considering this topic got you to make your first ever post to this sub, I'd consider those algorithms a success.

Any model north of like 2bil parameters isn't worth the hassle of running locally. Even Ada sized models require a ton of vram and ram. Use a cloud compute service like Azure or Paperspace

>why does there need to be a handshake at all? Why can't Bob send 1000 packets, each annotated with a sequence from 1000-2000, and at the end sends a "closing packet" saying "just ended sending you seq 1000-2000, tell me if you missed any and then I'll retransmit"?

The handshake is necessary to verify incoming packets are coming from the correct source. If Alice just asks Bob for data without establishing a handshake she has no garuntee that Bob ever got the request or that the response isn't coming from a malicious third party. UDP technically doesn't have a handshake built into it's protocol but any streaming service that uses UDP implements their own handshake in the application layer.

>Why can't we just do:Alice sends sequence number and Bob sends sequence number back? What failure case does the third ACK prevents from happening? A comparisonor example between how a 2 way would be different from a 3 way would be great, but I can't find any online.

The final ack of the three way handshake tells the server that the client is ready to receive data. Without it the server wouldn't know when the client is ready to receive data.

Research can only go so far in the social sciences. There is no definitive answer. Having said that, looking at the rust belt it probably one of the best recent examples of mass replacement via uncompetitive labor markets https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rust_Belt

The answer seems to be that yes, the invisible hand won't magically create new jobs in a free market, government investment into propping up new industries is necessary.

The question is can government keep up with the coming replacement.