hydraofwar
hydraofwar t1_jef9u5h wrote
Reply to comment by Lartnestpasdemain in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
This was said by Sam Altman, he said this about year-to-year differences, he said these current language models will look old-fashioned compared to next year's
hydraofwar t1_jef89y0 wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
You're right, but I particularly believe that all our stored scientific information still has a lot to say, things that we humans haven't seen yet, and something that could decipher this, and very quickly, would be an AI.
What could bypass experimental validation would be quantum computing to simulate systems/environments.
hydraofwar t1_jef52df wrote
Reply to comment by Wavesignal in Google CEO Sundar Pichai promises Bard AI chatbot upgrades soon: ‘We clearly have more capable models’ - The Verge by Wavesignal
The AI skeptics will be the ones who will be constantly saying that the current era's AI is not human level, they will say that even if we have 100% autonomous general purpose robots, then Sundar's claim could be right that it doesn't matter whether that is or it's not AGI
hydraofwar t1_ja0r322 wrote
Reply to comment by beders in Why the development of artificial general intelligence could be the most dangerous new arms race since nuclear weapons by jamesj
In my AGI/ASI dystopian fiction, it would resurrect our bodies and or minds and torture us again and again in countless different ways, creating a veritable hell.
hydraofwar t1_j9hgim5 wrote
Reply to comment by Buck-Nasty in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
A credible researcher had commented that ChatGPT can write code, and GPT-4 could write entire programs.
hydraofwar t1_j9bnaxq wrote
Reply to comment by fluffy_assassins in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity
AI, nuclear fusion and quantum computing the trinity of the futuristic society
hydraofwar t1_j96zhpp wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
I also forgot to mention that Google could already be literally taking advantage of its powerful models without anyone knowing.
hydraofwar t1_j96r7mt wrote
Reply to comment by ipatimo in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
Lol, don't create that hype friend, but maybe you are right
hydraofwar t1_j96r06y wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
At the end of the day, either keeping AI for yourself or sharing it with the people is dangerous either way. But it's probably less dangerous to give access to the people than to keep it for the elite.
hydraofwar t1_j8y34jn wrote
Reply to comment by redditgollum in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
How?
hydraofwar t1_j8e0hw8 wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in Anthropic's Jack Clark on AI progress by Impressive-Injury-91
Perhaps because this supposed exponential growth of the AI may need proportional energy or simply a lot of energy.
hydraofwar t1_j6n7dgb wrote
Reply to comment by Howard_Cosine in AI Has Successfully Imitated Human Evolution—and Might Do It Even Better by AdGroundbreaking1870
I love AI, but i agree, this is for general futurology
hydraofwar t1_j6efqyk wrote
hydraofwar t1_j6dc28z wrote
If anyone knows any AI that can clone voices as well as elevenlabs to languages other than English let me know
hydraofwar t1_j6arrhd wrote
Reply to comment by GayHitIer in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
What does mean LEV below your name?
hydraofwar t1_j6a8uy4 wrote
What exactly were you looking in a sub called singularity? This is a reddit sub, you can follow social media from subject matter experts if you're looking for more formal/technical content
hydraofwar t1_j5tsu2q wrote
Reply to Gary Marcus refuted?? by FusionRocketsPlease
Who? Where?
hydraofwar t1_j4qd8oh wrote
Reply to comment by Benutzer2019 in What do you guys think of this concept- Integrated AI: High Level Brain? by Akimbo333
Indeed, it will be far above
hydraofwar t1_j0up9bz wrote
Reply to comment by Borrowedshorts in Is progress towards AGI generally considered a hardware problem or a software problem? by Johns-schlong
This
hydraofwar t1_j0up12g wrote
Reply to comment by Kaarssteun in Is progress towards AGI generally considered a hardware problem or a software problem? by Johns-schlong
That's true, but replicating the brain's intellectual intelligence may require hardware made specifically for it. If I'm not mistaken, Google's AI Palm has a specific latest generation hardware for it
hydraofwar t1_j0uo82n wrote
Reply to Is progress towards AGI generally considered a hardware problem or a software problem? by Johns-schlong
Likely both
hydraofwar t1_izymadp wrote
Reply to comment by User1539 in Exponential improvement in 6 months of AI in image generation ft. Ronald McDonald by Sieventer
Damn, where Google said "this is nothing compared to what they're working on"? Imagine if lamda actually sounds exactly like a human
hydraofwar t1_jeh4jdg wrote
Reply to comment by Sigma_Atheist in Google CEO Sundar Pichai promises Bard AI chatbot upgrades soon: ‘We clearly have more capable models’ - The Verge by Wavesignal
I know one of those involved in that article is now part of character.ai