This subreddit heavily underrates how predictable humans are, and reading minds isn't a hard task for a good AI system as well.

We're walking meat. We'll be heavily manipulated by AI in the next months, AI supervillians are going to exist by 2024-2025.

>Yes the machine is acting like a human

No, it's not. We don't have any AI system even slightly being comparable to the intelligence of an insect.

>But does it have qualia?

We can't prove humans have qualia.

>unsimulatable

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsimulable just sharing

We don't have any hint to think a good enough simulation can't simulate real world processes. We already have simulated systems and they're used everyday on multiple fields of science.

From a physical point of view, it makes no sense to think it's unsimulable, considering intelligence comes from a macromolecular level: life comes from molecules=>cells=>organisms, it's very unlikely that we need to simulate quarks to make intelligence work. If we can simulate molecules, proteins, etc... it's a matter of organizing them in the same way as a human and boom, you have simulated humans.

Everything is on/off. With computation we can simulate molecules, atoms, proteins, circuits, organs. I don't get your point.

Computation allows the simulation of all physics properties, even quantum physics via quantum computation.

There are just two possibilities.

1. Qualia is a product of configuration of matter to produce a result using energy.

2. Qualia is a product of configuration of something that isn't matter.

If it's 1, then it should be replicable with technology (it's a matter of off/on and that's it, transistors, neurons).

If it's 2, then science makes no sense.

Unless you're talking about quantum mysticism, no, there's nothing inherently different. It's a matter of algorithmic implementation. Qualia is software, not hardware.

https://www.businessinsider.com/deepmind-secret-plot-break-away-from-google-project-watermelon-mario-2021-9

DeepMind (Demis) is against corporation approaches. Google bought DeepMind and Demis later regretted that transaction. They're in a tense relationship, which explains why in the last years Alphabet has heavily invested in Google AI to separate themselves from DeepMind. Anyone that follows closely the AI news would know that Google is ignoring most DeepMind news. They don't even tweet about their progress, yet they tweet everything about Google AI.

They have two LLMs (Lambda and Sparrow), and the one that's going to be released on Google is Lambda, not Sparrow (DeepMind). DeepMind is a rebel inner research team inside Google. I wouldn't even say they're inside Google, they're not even in the same country.

Without enhanced abilities.

>If I get super intelligence I'm going to use it to protect (and give freedom to) as much sentient life as I can, for as long as I am able. I mean it. I hope others will do the same

To me, this is inviting others to trigger the gun, then you'll cry because it's "bad" that they tried to do good using AI. But hey, this thread is getting nowhere. I appreciate your responses, really. But I have 10000 things to do.

That won't stop the bullet.

And they'll say the same of your thinking.

To them, a gay is a villain, to you, the homophobe is a villain. As simple as that. They'll both use AI to do "good". One to be gay, other to be homophobe.

The only point I'm making is that you're saying AI could do good because of people doing good. What I'm saying is that people doing good can mean people doing bad to others.

The difference between a supervillain and a guardian angel is null. Different people have different meanings.

"AI could make people do good", sure, the type of good that is killing people on Ukraine and billions of people are supporting?

I don't know what is a supervillain to you, but if people with low IQ and slow internet can commit crimes, imagine someone with enhanced capabilities that can create fake audios, videos, images, fake proofs of everything just blinking twice to the AR glasses.

I'm not decrying anything, I'm literally saying "I'll do good, I hope everyone does" doesn't stop wars, violence, crimes or anything like that. Because they're empty words without meanings in this society.

"Some people don't understand what is right" lol, okay, explain that to the criminal while he's shooting you thinking he's doing good.

There're Philippines guys with broken English on Tinder scamming people from Norway every week and you say a person enhanced with LLM/LVM and enhanced sensors can't commit crimes?

What I'm saying is that "suffering", "oppression", "freedom", "liberty", "peace", "war", "violence" and "self defense" are subjective terms without consensus in our societies.

I'm shocked I'm having this discussion. Don't you watch the news? We're literally having a war in Ukraine and nobody agrees what is good or bad, what is self defense or what is peace.

The lack of political knowledge in this sub is crystal clear, as you seem to misunderstand that peace, good, bad, violence... Aren't agreed concepts.

What is good for you can be bad for me.

DeepMind is the worst enemy of Google. It seems most people think the fact that Google AI competes with DeepMind is just a coincidence. No. Google is consciously moving money from DeepMind to Google AI, because DeepMind is against corporation mindset.

A person with low IQ can use tools made by people with high IQ to make smart plans to achieve evil goals though.

I don't agree. Having terribly good AR glasses with customized sensors and a custom LLM/LVM that's pretty competent (not necessarily AGI) is enough to become a supervillain, especially in poor countries.

Calling chatGPT a calculator is valid, as long as you accept you're also a calculator.

Because they don't host any pornographic content in their servers, just links. That gives responsibility to the user.

Nonsense. Family makes sense for survival purposes. Otherwise it doesn't. And an AGI without survival needs of cooperation with families wouldn't consider us family.

My best interest is that the AGI is reasonable.