grimkhor
grimkhor t1_jechv5n wrote
Reply to comment by jclucas1989 in the sad reality behind those loss porn you like to see by jposemescouilles
I think the sad story is that he didn't understand that they don't give a fuk and just don't want to get sued. So he wrote an actual email instead of just randomly saying he's a billionaire to get approved.
grimkhor t1_jecg6f9 wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
Rude again for no reason if I may point it out again. Maybe try to be nicer to other people. Doesn't really help you if p1ss me off and I leave does it?
grimkhor t1_jecfmnr wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
I don't see any problem with that. You complained about that people here call each other "regarded". You calling me as a user of the sub an 1diots, an 1ncel, a rac1st and an anti-semite is honestly extremely hateful. I don't know what post you're talking about. I usually check out "new" and there was nothing today. There's also nothing in the "hot" post so I have no clue what you're talking about.
grimkhor t1_jece2c7 wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
You used plenty of swear words yourself. A bit hypocritical don't you think? Never heard anything you mention besides "regarded". There's plenty of people here that have no clue what they're doing. There's ton of new people constantly visiting this site that ask for advice and get called a dummy, told to never come back and send to r/investing btw. There's a good part of people here that manage funds, work in finance or are otherwise very smart about investing. You're very close minded actually building such a strong opinion on things that could be classified as rumors. Don't you have in every random group in life a bell curve distribution of people? And why would you not rather tell these people how to do it better than insulting them?
grimkhor t1_jecc8sn wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
Why do you visit a sub that you hate? I don't even know what you mean. Didn't hear anything about any reparations here ever. Ok. Good luck have fun.
grimkhor t1_jecb94x wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
I don't have such authority. Please mail the mods if that's your wish. You're a very unpleasant and rude person so it could be appropriate to do other things that improve your mood than trying to insult random people here and try to make their life worse. Drinking tea or meditation is recommended.
grimkhor t1_jecaots wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
Still rude
grimkhor t1_jecaj6j wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
Rude
grimkhor t1_jeca69u wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
Don't care. Didn't ask. Go away now I'm bored
grimkhor t1_jec7533 wrote
Reply to comment by Smirking_Panda in How does this actually work? by Fit-Good-9731
Ah yes what does this mentally stable person have to share. Ah yes nothing. Moving on
grimkhor t1_je6q8d7 wrote
Reply to comment by gangix in Estimations for remaining economic data this week by theswmr
It is actually quite relevant for a few things in my opinion besides housing but this is just my personal opinion from now on. Houses are usually acquired with mortgages so a rise in pending sales means not only are houses still sold but liquidity is not drying up from banks for home loans. This might be an early sign that the bank issues are actually not the end of the world. It was also a huge discrepancy on top.
grimkhor t1_je6p48v wrote
Reply to comment by PilgrimOz in Estimations for remaining economic data this week by theswmr
>US February pending home sales +0.8% vs -2.3% expected
Here you go. A bone for the regarded.
grimkhor t1_je6oqqg wrote
Reply to comment by gangix in Estimations for remaining economic data this week by theswmr
>US February pending home sales +0.8% vs -2.3% expected
Houses are still getting sold. Doesn't look like a recession. This was released today.
grimkhor t1_je5wj4w wrote
Wait. Is raiding a bank not just a robbery? Can I also raid my local bank for fraud allegation? Asking for a friend
grimkhor t1_jdztp5o wrote
Reply to comment by terrytibbs76 in What is a sucesssful rate of return for an options trader. by Aimadness
>The historical average yearly return of the S&P 500 is 10.326% over the last 20 years, as of the end of February 2023.
>
>The average annualized return since its inception in 1928 through Dec. 31, 2022, is 9.82%.
No problem here are the actual returns.
grimkhor t1_jdzspra wrote
Reply to comment by terrytibbs76 in What is a sucesssful rate of return for an options trader. by Aimadness
That's buying the S&P 500 over the long term. Trading is about being successful on trades and scaling it with volume. If you trade to get the S&P 500 return stop trading brother and become a long term investor.
grimkhor t1_jdyweu0 wrote
Reply to comment by Aimadness in What is a sucesssful rate of return for an options trader. by Aimadness
>As described by Zuckerman, Medallion’s strategy involved constantly opening and covering thousands of short-term positions, both long and short. According to Robert Mercer, one of Medallion’s key investment managers, Medallion was right on only about 50.75% of its trades. Nonetheless, he stated that taken over millions of trades that percentage allowed the firm to make billions. It is worth noting that engaging in millions of trades suggests that the transaction costs would be significant. The fact that the reported gross returns are after trading costs, makes Medallion’s performance even more extraordinary. It also implies that Renaissance was apparently particularly effective in minimizing such costs.
If you can actually reliable make 50.75% of your trades successful all it takes is making enough trades and reducing costs. The moral of the story is anyone who talks about a 50.80%+ success rate is lying to you. I would go even further and even say the ones talking about a 50%+ success rate are probably lying.
grimkhor t1_jdyqsla wrote
So let's put it like that. The most successful trading company ever lead by Jim Simons and a bunch of actually very very smart people could produce a reliable 50.75% win rate and made insane returns with that. Everyone else is extremely likely way worse. Don't ever think it's anything but a casino if you're trading.
Your best bet is actually finding some arbitrage opportunity in a niche which are the only "traders" that are actually successful and pray it never goes away.
grimkhor t1_jdupedg wrote
Reply to Looking for people to invest. by that0neguy02
> maximize risk
and minimize profits. Just how I like it
grimkhor t1_jdju1y4 wrote
Reply to comment by Gummy_Jones in Can anyone provide an honest reason to be bullish right now? by [deleted]
And buying
grimkhor t1_jdi6bzo wrote
Reply to comment by Ill-Expression1737 in Microsoft Activision acquisition by Bushskeng
Either just the stock. 90 Jun 16 23 calls if you feel spicy and don't think it will get any delays or 90 Aug 18 23 calls.
grimkhor t1_jdi5f1y wrote
Reply to comment by Bushskeng in Microsoft Activision acquisition by Bushskeng
Options above 95 died today. I'm not really sure why option at 95 are holding as they would expire worthless?! This were fantastic news.
grimkhor t1_jdi4m17 wrote
Reply to Microsoft Activision acquisition by Bushskeng
It's gonna happen. Big payday for daddy
grimkhor t1_jd534s0 wrote
Truestiestest words ever said
grimkhor t1_jecnvaq wrote
Reply to Went long QQQ calls today. I feel very dirty. by mrnotadvice
Wtf you doing with your nose? Grab your ballz and buy some calls.