Man, it's a break from photos of monuments and posts about crime and the homeless

Someone that likes gimmick limited time cocktail menus and the taste of cherry blossom

It's very DC of people to see you say "luxury apartment" which likely means high rent and say you are entitled for not wanting it to be noisy as fuck

​

I would ask for a different unit. Most luxury apartments should have them, they would rather keep units empty than lower rent.

If "attack" is non-violent and not a crime and she is getting yelled at for being a piece of shit, it does not violate TOS for me to say it should happen more often

It serves to make money for media personalities who need these stories to continue a culture war that benefits rich assholes

Right wingers are so fucking inept and incapable of research they think Kinky Boots is new and porn

It is also license.

​

Right wing media person bitches about something unimportant, other media personalities have to do it too or the culture war isn't enforced. Some people who never thought about it are mad for the first time, people who always disliked it but never saw a weakness in the social approach to an issue now see a place they can attack and do.

​

My boss is a DC media personality. I assure you he only complains about these events because other right wing personalities did first, and he never thought about it before despite knowing they existed. He created nothing. Others here did create the fake outrage, making real outrage, and their viewers have been angry but quiet. Neither group is good.

If we got rid of them no one would miss them

Maybe they're piling on because you said something fucking stupid and contradictory and refuse to back down from the demand that it should make sense to everyone

"They weren't reached because (makes something up with no information)"

Keep the insults to yourself. I apologize for suggesting you might not have all the answers. Obviously whatever you have decided is correct is.

Half of those there were not reached. That means a quarter denied it. What is so hard to understand here?

In order to be counted as denying a service, you have to be offered it. That is how data works. Half were not reached at all.

I'll take the word of those affected over some guy on Reddit.

I have friends that, despite the statement by people that shelters are available, took months to get placed.

"If you were not there to deny a service, you denied it." Very deep shit. Jesus, how do you survive without drowning yourself in the rain

I appreciate when someone makes shit up and says "these are just facts"

That doesn't seem accurate.

​

https://americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/homeless

That's at least three people you have insisted are too stupid to understand you.

​

Maybe there's a constant in this issue where so many people can't get your shifting statement

Half of them could not be reached. Insisting these are the same thing is either intellectually or deliberately dishonest.

So... you understand that's not denied, right? Half aren't even counted in this data.

I don't know how you can smugly "give me some stats" and not understand they oppose your entire point.

​

I think that's enough time for your man. You should take the time you would give to being smug to a stranger to think about what little information you have and how it counters your own position.

You should read more than you write.

​

https://www.reddit.com/r/washingtondc/comments/118eh0l/comment/j9hu2lq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

"I'm trying to be respectful but I am going to dig through your shit to find a way to insult you." Gimme a fucking break.

​

There is a difference between denying a service that is directly offering to you and being counted as "not taking" something you were unaware of or not offered specifically; these programs are often seen as being not utilized by those who need them while in reality getting them, or having them offered at all, is more difficult or unlikely than you imply, and the numbers are offered publicly to appear as if people simply refuse. I am sorry you can't grasp that difference and believe the city's statement without question.

Did they deny it, or did they not take it? Different things.

​

My apologies for expecting you to know what you're saying and have it be true, I won't do that again, seems to put you in a rough mood

You're getting that information from?

And a different park is not. In a year, they will come back to this park when the current dirty park is cleaned.

​

If your issue is resolved, you lack object permanence.

Taxes. Taxes aren't your money. I have yet to bomb a small Yemen boy with my stealth bomber because it's not my money.