gerkletoss

gerkletoss t1_j2wy7n7 wrote

Kinda seems like greenwashing. Graphite for anodes is currently produced from petroleum coke and coal tar pitch, but really any carbon will do with some slight tweaking of the process. I'm not convinced that felling trees to avoid using the waste byproducts of fossil fuels for something useful is actually helping the environment, but I'm willing to be convinced otherwise.

3

gerkletoss t1_j2epuhd wrote

The astronauts are near the reactor. They can potentially service it in shirt sleeves.

A meltdown is nearly impossible with current designs, but it would definitely halt ISRU operations until a new reactor could be sent.

19

gerkletoss t1_j2el583 wrote

Yeah but no way in hell is it six times less mass when you factor in all the equipment required to actually install the panels in a >300 km circumference ring and wire them up to a polar base. Then there's the usefulness of the reactor's waste heat for melting ice.

And good lucking servicing this distributed network of solar panels.

19

gerkletoss t1_j21d5bx wrote

3

gerkletoss t1_j211wsd wrote

4

gerkletoss t1_j20p2ki wrote

Do they not know about salt fog? The water vapor over the ocean is less saline than the ocean, but still saline enough to really fuck with machines that aren't designed for maritime applications.

11