Is it wrong to harm animals or something?

The animals aren't born. So you can't not eat what doesn't exist.

But the animals won't ever have existed to be eaten. So you can't say that.

Right. But this infographic is showing the impact that a single meat based day has on that figure.

So how would you phrase it from that perspective?

So how would you describe the concept in the infographic?

So what word would you use that's better?

You are preventing animals being born into a life of suffering. What word would you prefer?

Seems like you're hanging your hat on being pedantic, rather than addressing the point.

Who is talking about preventing anyone from doing anything? The reality is that it's better to not be born than to starve to death at a young age. Do you agree with that?

OK. Let's use this as an example.

People were forced to breed to create more slaves. Was this overall a good thing? When this practice was banned, were people saved from slavery?

The people born through this practice were guaranteed a lifetime of slavery. Not being born into this life is preferable.

I'm talking at a higher level. If you think that the only think that matters is the existence of a kid, then you are suggesting that using contraception is morally equal to killing a kid.

Do you consider not having kids to be equal to killing a kid?