fishybird
fishybird t1_jdtf6jh wrote
Reply to [D] Simple Questions Thread by AutoModerator
Anyone else bothered by how often LLMs are being called "conscious"? in AI focused YouTube channels and even in this very sub, comments are getting dozens of upvotes for saying we're getting close to creating consciousness.
I don't know why, but it seems dangerous to have a bunch of people running around thinking these things deserve human rights simply because they behave like a human.
fishybird t1_jdteel7 wrote
Reply to comment by artsybashev in [D] GPT4 and coding problems by enryu42
Ah yes, the "ai is conscious because it can do cool things" take. Humanity is screwed
fishybird t1_jdg7ijt wrote
Reply to comment by marcus_hk in [N] ChatGPT plugins by Singularian2501
Langchain is kind of a competitor. They probably don't want to bring any more publicity to it, let alone mention it
fishybird t1_jdvy0h1 wrote
Reply to comment by pale2hall in [D] Simple Questions Thread by AutoModerator
Well yeah that's the whole problem! Why are we even calling them "tests for consciousness"? Tests for consciousness don't exist and the only reason we are using the word "consciousness" is pure media hype. If an AI reporter even uses the word "conscious" I immediately know not to trust them. It's really sad to see that anyone, much less "experts", are seriously discussing whether or not transformers can be conscious