eyegasm_jpeg
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixlhsdw wrote
Reply to comment by transtattoo in Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
Ok
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixh8932 wrote
Reply to comment by MykirEUW in Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
:D thanks, no way
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixh78fq wrote
Reply to comment by MykirEUW in Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
Why? Im a man. Why am i evil?
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixh3vxl wrote
Reply to comment by ObjectiveCorgi9898 in Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
if this photo was taken by a woman, would it be ok?
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixeqi0i wrote
Reply to Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
Minolta X-700, Rokkor-x 50mm f/1.4, Fujifilm Superia X-tra 400 135
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixeq8k0 wrote
Reply to comment by Booblicle in Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
I didn’t wrote: its Fujifilm Superia 400 35mm film
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixepysg wrote
Reply to comment by Booblicle in Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
Thanks! Its very good what you said. the grain here is digital (these are laboratory budget scans, but the noritsu scanner can do better. I scanned the first frame in high resolution on a Nikon - everything is much better there). I have no complaints about the exposure meter. I agree that somewhere the composition, light, focus, depth of field are wrong. but I must say that all 36 frames were improvisation, without preparation and idea.
Submitted by eyegasm_jpeg t3_z23l69 in Art
eyegasm_jpeg OP t1_ixliwax wrote
Reply to comment by ObjectiveCorgi9898 in Julia, me, Photography, 2022 by eyegasm_jpeg
and there will be criticism from the point of view of photography? because everything else is of little interest to me