endorfan13

endorfan13 t1_jadrpos wrote

I think their point was that we do not hear about, or have all the discourse over, medical malpractice which has a much higher statistic as a cause of death (recent sources I just searched put an estimated 250k on medical malpractice and 43k on all gun related deaths [homicides, suicides, accidents, etc.]).

I don't feel it's a diversion tactic to shift attention as much as it is a question of why 2A and gun control receive ALL the attention.

2

endorfan13 t1_jadpo4s wrote

There are plenty of examples in recent history of underground resistance being incredibly tough to crack. It may seem nonsensical, but people to this day are doing it very well against tanks and drones and bombs. The US has more firearms than people. People are not subdued by tanks and drones. It takes other people to actually take a foothold in some territory. I bet you can imagine how much tougher that would become against a group that was well armed and supplied, dug in, and fortified (their own backyards). I don't think it is nonsensical at all.

2

endorfan13 t1_j6kpit4 wrote

We all know some shit. Accredited info is good. Much better when digested from multiple accredited and peer reviewed sources. Better when those sources are as close to unbiased as you can find. Better yet when you understand the path to enlightenment begins by admitting we know nothing. The fuckin cherry is when that old boy asks "wanna know my trade secret?"

Grain of salt shit.

6