dumb_commenter
dumb_commenter t1_j9722ag wrote
Reply to comment by C3PD2 in Tiger Woods cards 4-under 67; best round to par since 2020. by PrincessBananas85
No objection here. He’s still one of the 3 I listed. Who are all only close to matched by one another.
dumb_commenter t1_j96pow6 wrote
Reply to comment by C3PD2 in Tiger Woods cards 4-under 67; best round to par since 2020. by PrincessBananas85
Agree with all that. But again if we’re talking dominance over a sport hard to limit to a single surface that represents a quarter of the season.
dumb_commenter t1_j964p05 wrote
Reply to comment by C3PD2 in Tiger Woods cards 4-under 67; best round to par since 2020. by PrincessBananas85
Agreed - but I think it’s hard to limit sports dominance to a single open.
dumb_commenter t1_j95l3ra wrote
Reply to comment by taco_helmet in Tiger Woods cards 4-under 67; best round to par since 2020. by PrincessBananas85
One can’t say that they’ve “stood alone” - but Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic have displayed an almost unparalleled dominance over a sport for 20 years.
dumb_commenter t1_jedlc2o wrote
Reply to Should I read The Martian by Andy Weir even if I’ve already watch the movie and remember most plot points? by CaregiverBig7228
The book was funnier and also about 10x more fascinating from a scientific perspective. What were montages in the movie were excellent and detailed explanations in the book.
And there’s also a few extra twists and turns in the book not in the movie.