Yeah that's crazy. I guess it doesn't make sense to have a cap on wage garnishment if there's no cap on how much they can take from bank. Wages go into a bank as soon as their paid lol.
It's silly that a state would not allow wage garnishment but would allow bank garnishment. I'd prefer to have a wage garnishment since there's a cap there, rather than all of my money be depleted.
Yeah I have a lawyer who is representing me so I haven't been in contact with the plaintiff/creditor.
So they could take everything? There's no limit/percentage to how much they could tank from bank? This is in TX as well
dudeindebt1990 OP t1_iy99w6l wrote
Reply to comment by newbeginingshey in Debt collection - how long after judgment before bank is garnished? by dudeindebt1990
Yeah that's crazy. I guess it doesn't make sense to have a cap on wage garnishment if there's no cap on how much they can take from bank. Wages go into a bank as soon as their paid lol. It's silly that a state would not allow wage garnishment but would allow bank garnishment. I'd prefer to have a wage garnishment since there's a cap there, rather than all of my money be depleted.