dude_catastrophe
dude_catastrophe t1_j5l33by wrote
Reply to comment by Raecino in What are the chances that development pressure from Pennsport, Passyunk, and Lower Moyamensing continues to the middle blocks? by NonIdentifiableUser
Maybe not so much with market-rate housing, but affordable housing development and/or city-funded repair programs to existing homes does have an effect on crime. This was identified in a UPenn study with the PHDC: https://whyy.org/articles/how-fixing-leaky-roofs-reduced-crime-in-philly-neighborhoods/
dude_catastrophe t1_j5l2nho wrote
Reply to What are the chances that development pressure from Pennsport, Passyunk, and Lower Moyamensing continues to the middle blocks? by NonIdentifiableUser
The PHDC and UPenn did a study that identified a relationship between improving homes and a reduction in neighborhood crime, so there's that! Article here: https://whyy.org/articles/how-fixing-leaky-roofs-reduced-crime-in-philly-neighborhoods/
dude_catastrophe t1_j0ujrtj wrote
Reply to comment by dangerburns880 in What the hell was that? by [deleted]
What an honor! A personal escort by an F-15!
dude_catastrophe t1_iyppt4b wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in University of Pennsylvania student attacked in Center City; female suspect sought by JBizznass
I guess so, educate me then?
dude_catastrophe t1_iypncft wrote
Reply to comment by Thingswithcookies in University of Pennsylvania student attacked in Center City; female suspect sought by JBizznass
I feel like that’s a slippery slope, ethically speaking. It’s easy to say we should just forcibly remove someone who is presenting such obvious psychosis but what’s to stop a someone from claiming “mental illness” in bad faith on someone else just to have them carried away to a jail cell/crisis center? Aside from clear danger and life and death situations, there’s a reason we still require someone to go willingly into custody for mental illness.
dude_catastrophe t1_itznukk wrote
Weccacoe playground, seger park, and shuylkill river park all come to mind.
dude_catastrophe t1_jeeklld wrote
Reply to comment by illy-chan in Airbnb is alerting hosts about subpoenas from the City of Philadelphia by Meatfrom1stgrade
I think the problem is getting variances for zoning on the Air BnB properties where they don’t live. Variances are not guaranteed and applying for them are time-consuming and costly. Based on the new rules the zoning needs to be a certain way if you don’t live in the property. If it’s not zoned correctly, then you have to do a typical leasing arrangement and all the paperwork and clearances that go with it. Pre-regulation changes, Air BnB just made it easier to circumvent a lot of the requirements and costs associated with leasing out property.