dudaspl
dudaspl t1_j03hykv wrote
Reply to comment by Robo-Connery in National Ignition Facility (NIF) announces net positive energy fusion experiment by Robo-Connery
Great commentary thanks. It's a nice breakthrough but I hate how they game the Q-factor definitions to pretend to be closer to producing energy than they really are. I'm looking forward to the commentary on tokomaks and I have a hypothetical question: if JET/ITER/the MIT one wanted to game the system, would they be able to use a lot of "external" energy to prolong/improve fusion and demonstrate a breakthrough on this stupid metric of "energy delivered to plasma"?
dudaspl t1_je3zq9d wrote
Reply to comment by LeEpicCheeseman in [D] Prediction time! Lets update those Bayesian priors! How long until human-level AGI? by LanchestersLaw
Exactly. LLMs mimic intelligence by just generating text, and since they are trained on civilization-level knowledge/data they do it very well and can seem as intelligent as humans.
The real test is to put them to novel scenarios and see how their intelligence can produce solutions to these, i.e. put it in an some sort of escape room and see if they can escape.