delco_trash

delco_trash t1_j8wfsn6 wrote

I'm for the death penalty in very narrow situations such as the person is on camera commiting the homicide, and with a higher standard than reasonable doubt.

Ex. Someone robs a bank and shoots a teller in the face with a shotgun. There's cell phone footage, no alibi, CCTV, and several eye witnesses who provide testimony.

In that case I'd be for it.

But even then there would need to be aggravating circumstances.

However, this is so rare, and this isn't the current standard, so as it stands under the system, a moratorium isn't entirely bad.

6

delco_trash t1_iw3g1gx wrote

It felt like a slip for sure.

Maybe subconsciously he wanted to go back to the quiet life and realized being a senator doesn't get you in the spotlight the same way being on television with a tall show does.

Maybe he realized that being in a state such as Pennsylvania is so purple that it's 50/50 and many people will hate you.

2

delco_trash t1_iw0y9ng wrote

I imagine lamb shoving his third steak into his mouth at a fancy restaurant washing it down with expensive wine and you ask if you can have a bread roll.

The button on his shirt busts off and he burps loudly in your face while telling you, 'Sorry kid, but we just don't have the resources for that right."

He then eats a live child in one bite while rubbing his bloated belly.

You walk outside and see Fetterman working as a garbage man who sees you bummed out and offers you a hit from his blunt.

That's how I viewed this race, and yes I'll take the blunt over whatever the hell the elitist first option is.

8

delco_trash t1_itwkvmw wrote

But one is actually from Pennsylvania and worked at Americorps to teach illiterate children how to read in Braddock while the other scammed elderly people by selling bullshit cures. So I'll take the guy with the stammer over the asshole doctor who doesn't believe womyan can make their own choices.

4