>I'm aware that near perfect ai movies are decades away

No, it will most probably be possible in 2025 at the latest. Don't miss the incredible achievements of this year and our place at the exponential curve by obsessing over small problems.

We say similar things in general, yes. But the OP worrying about the difficulty of giving career advice to students stroke me as an anti-pattern in the exponential phase that we're in. I think it's basically the wrong question, or the wrong thing to worry about in particular.

>Imagine, for example, trying to advise a child entering high school or junior high next year about what careers will still be viable when they grow up.

Please don't take it personally but this is a good example of why it's already out of control, and we won't be able to keep up. We're still planning our life in terms of which college we should attend, jobs, careers, salary, or even retirement, while it's painfully obvious that all those concepts are about to lose all their meaning soon. Another nice example is teachers trying to find out ways to identify if the students have "cheated" by using AI in their essays. We're embarrassingly trying to make sense of the new paradigm, using the thought patterns that were only useful in the old one. We look like Coyote from the cartoon, who is still running unaware that he's about to fall down the cliff.

It has a token limit of 4000 which is significantly shorter than most books. Will most probably be significantly improved this year though.

r/anarchoprimitivism