That's prejudice. You don't know that.

Can't imagine where we'll be in 10 more years of innovation.

Really? So the time has come where a small-scale AI model being smarter than "ordinary" humans is not impressive.

So what, I've spent hours trying to get ChatGPT to write lesbian erotica and I don't regret that. Shove it, OpenAI.

>Something like 1/3 of young men said they felt lonely in the past year.

Wait, are you saying that 2/3 of young men never felt lonely in the past year? I didn't know there were that many sluts!

>Forget Sex.

If only I could...

Much easier.

People will be able to search for any kind of sexual fantasy they want, and it will be created by the generative AI on demand if it doesn't already exist. Thus we simply won't be able to stop masturbating.

Forget political views. Sex is the real danger here.

They are sluts. Just ignore them.

And, needless to say, slutty.

Nobody should own anything.

>Just try to live your life as if AGI will never come

Don't speak carelessly like that, there may be children in the room.

I'm also not into anal but one really shouldn't have to analyze Sam's facial expressions and tone of voice to see that AGI is very, very close. Just looking back at the exponentially increasing pace of innovation in AI is enough.

In that case maybe educated opinion is worse than the wisdom of the crowds, as the community prediction for AGI was 2040 last year as you can see from the post which is not "10 years away".

>What's interesting is, 10 years ago the prediction of a lot of people I knew was 10 years and hey it's 10 years again.

May be true for "the people you know", but if you look at the general opinion of people interested in this field, the predictions used to start at the 2040s just last year.

>But the 30's will be the start of AGI, and 40's will be when it really takes off

I vehemently disagree. How would it take 10 years for such a transformative technology to be optimized and utilized? Do you have a timeline for that 10 years between "start of the AGI" and its takeoff?

Is that meaningfully better than just googling?

That will never happen, sorry. At most thanks to brain imaging you can create a digital avatar similar to yourself in many aspects, but that avatar will not be a direct extension or substitute for your biological body. And as an aside humanity as a whole will also become redundant and driven to extinction very soon.

Take another look at which subreddit you're on.

I'm not sure, how are your head-job skills? If not satisfactory you may have to find another alternative.

I'll give it to you that emotions in TTS are difficult, though I still say what is needed is not a novel algorithm but an enhanced version of today's algorithms. For example the AI that will generate the movie's scenario can also add marks at the text that will indicate the correct emotion or punctuation, and I'm pretty convinced we can have a TTS algorithm that can reasonably abide by those in three years.

Have you ever heard of something called... text-to-speech?

Actually I'll say sound and voices are one of the easiest parts, to the degree that it's almost possible even today.

Take a pen and paper (or open your favorite drawing software). With a top-down approach progressively identify the steps needed for fully automated movie generation, until you have the smallest ingredients. Think about what kind of tech is needed for each of them. You will notice that no paradigm-breaking discovery is needed - all of them are just advanced versions of existing tools and technology. Now extrapolate for when we can actually get to that level, using the recent speed of development in AI. I'm quite sure you won't be thinking it will take decades.