cornerblockakl
cornerblockakl t1_iwxwycl wrote
Reply to comment by DukeLukeivi in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
I hope you are a young lad and will pray every day you live to a ripe old age.
cornerblockakl t1_iwxnxls wrote
Reply to comment by DukeLukeivi in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
Intelligently? Of course not. Logically, yes.
cornerblockakl t1_iwxnf40 wrote
Reply to comment by reid0 in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
Do you not think the climate change alarmists are not presenting a doom and gloom future?
cornerblockakl t1_iwxcarp wrote
Reply to comment by akaNorman in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
No matter what you believe about your own super powers, you cannot predict the future. You simply can’t. And there is a whole (say it like Trump with me) HUUUGE group that believes that the real problem in the near future is population decline. The funny thing is that neither you nor they can predict the future that far out. (Roughly 30-60 years). So for Christ’s sake, just stop.
cornerblockakl t1_iwx6j5u wrote
Reply to comment by mad_wood_scientist in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
Has nobody heard of the Dunning Kruger effect?
cornerblockakl t1_iwx4swr wrote
Reply to US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
How come all the commenters on articles such as this have all the answers? Is there a super high concentration of genius scientists/engineers/investors attracted to articles solving the global energy crisis?
cornerblockakl t1_iwx4ghj wrote
Reply to comment by aurizon in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
Oh, NOW you think walls work. Lol
cornerblockakl t1_iwx46n1 wrote
Reply to comment by Arammil1784 in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
It’s not binary, you idiot. Stop the fear mongering.
cornerblockakl t1_iwwwogb wrote
Reply to comment by fasnoosh in Vaccine doubles brain tumour survival rate in medical breakthrough by tonymmorley
Brain tumor survivor rate. No wonder I don’t trust what people write.
cornerblockakl t1_iwi87o7 wrote
Reply to comment by KraiterHolz in A rare reason for optimism about climate change by aRationalMoose
I think we’ve reached the bifurcation of global warming thinking. Old fogeys like you need to get on board with the new current “we’ve averted a real climate change disaster” thinking. This will be the main meme by 2030. I’ve started seeing it pop up here and there.
cornerblockakl t1_iwi79g4 wrote
Reply to comment by Baz_EP in A rare reason for optimism about climate change by aRationalMoose
No. Kalim said there is no doubt we have eliminated the possibility of apocalyptic climate change and even linked a children’s video for proof.
cornerblockakl t1_iwfc03s wrote
Reply to comment by defiancy in Waymo’s driverless taxis keep making incremental progress, while others flounder by AdmiralKurita
You really could have fun with them. Dressed up mannequins and such. Oh boy!
cornerblockakl t1_iwfbtds wrote
Reply to comment by r4wbeef in Waymo’s driverless taxis keep making incremental progress, while others flounder by AdmiralKurita
Finally someone seems to get it.
cornerblockakl t1_iw3q8wd wrote
Reply to comment by stangerlpass in The human touch: ‘Artificial General Intelligence’ is next phase of AI by YaAbsolyutnoNikto
Comparing actual artificial intelligence to the industrial revolution is funny. It shows a complete lack of understanding of intelligence. Our own “industry” is mostly piddily manipulation of Newtonian physics and some very intelligent people using thought experiments to describe observations of “things.” Ex. Gravity, electricity, light, magnetism. The vast and deep secrets of the universe are currently just that. And yet what we do know compared to what we have created as “intelligent” is simply not on the same scale. Our machines are truly dumb imitators that might play chess well but can’t create chess. You will know when we create intelligence when some of it commits suicide. That is the true test of awareness/intelligence.
cornerblockakl t1_ivzsc2q wrote
In five years biden might still be president. In ten, definitely not. So we’ve got that to look forward to.
cornerblockakl t1_iv2uer6 wrote
Reply to comment by ratatatar in NASA Asteroid Threat Practice Drill Shows We're Not Ready by Soupjoe5
Yup, you nailed it. That’s it. Ten four. Now go take a knee for/with the thugs. Goodbye Felicia.
cornerblockakl t1_iv2cckb wrote
Reply to comment by ratatatar in NASA Asteroid Threat Practice Drill Shows We're Not Ready by Soupjoe5
You mean just like people were extra-judicially executed by thug-supporting rioters during the mostly peaceful protests? Lol. And at CHAZ. (From where I’m sitting you’re a thug supporter. Nah nah nah. Haha)
cornerblockakl t1_iv24zm5 wrote
Shut down society. Get gov handout money. Social distance. Wear a mask. Get out in the streets and riot for the protection of thugs. I think you’re ready.
cornerblockakl t1_iupqv5u wrote
Reply to comment by slutgenius in New RSV vaccines are on track to make this one of the last bad cold seasons by Man-from-Hjelmdall
You stupid cocksucker. Do you think you’ll win them over by calling them stupid. Lol. (Do you really think they are all stupid?)
cornerblockakl t1_iuizj3x wrote
Reply to comment by fish-rides-bike in Antarctica's emperor penguins at risk of extinction due to the climate crisis by mossadnik
It’s complicated. Very complicated. So complicated only a fool would put money on predictions in the future. Lol. So complicated that there will never be a precise graph plotting the demise of any species. Or sea level rise. Or temp changes. (The climate changes. Humans may influence it. So might the sun. Or axis tilt. Or a million other things)
cornerblockakl t1_iuirbt0 wrote
Reply to comment by fish-rides-bike in Antarctica's emperor penguins at risk of extinction due to the climate crisis by mossadnik
I’m still waiting to see the (any) decline plotted on a graph. That way we can check yearly progress of extinction of a species.
cornerblockakl t1_iugh7sz wrote
Reply to comment by monsterpwn in The New World: Envisioning Life After Climate Change by nevernotdating
Why is it that when someone disses Obama people like you ALWAYS think they are Trump sycophants?
cornerblockakl t1_iugadi4 wrote
Reply to comment by slax03 in The New World: Envisioning Life After Climate Change by nevernotdating
Like people tend to band together. You’re pretty quick to the ad hominem. Why is that? (I will admit I don’t know what “stoo” is.)
cornerblockakl t1_iug16em wrote
Reply to comment by Reasonable_Cover_804 in The New World: Envisioning Life After Climate Change by nevernotdating
Like Obama’s two beachfront properties. Or only the “bad guys?” Lol
cornerblockakl t1_iwxy3fz wrote
Reply to comment by DukeLukeivi in US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by nastratin
I’m an atheist. It’s an expression. I just hope in 30 or 40 years you realize neither you nor scientists can predict the future. (A very simple concept)