I notice in the Chinese reddit (aka. zhihu.com) someone raised a similar question (url:https://www.zhihu.com/question/570223822, you may read it with Google Translate), but most answerers (18/20, I think) hold a critical, or even satirical attitude, like this one:
>This paper is 100% naked falsification, the experimental numbers are filled in at will. The results written for the first time are much higher than other work, and the second time, it is reported lower.
I am not encouraging a more critical attitude to this work, and I just mention this phenomenon and hope to stimulate more discussions.
coniine_ t1_iyzbzhl wrote
Reply to [D] NeurIPS 2022 Outstanding Paper modified results significantly in the camera ready by Even_Stay3387
I notice in the Chinese reddit (aka. zhihu.com) someone raised a similar question (url:https://www.zhihu.com/question/570223822, you may read it with Google Translate), but most answerers (18/20, I think) hold a critical, or even satirical attitude, like this one:
>This paper is 100% naked falsification, the experimental numbers are filled in at will. The results written for the first time are much higher than other work, and the second time, it is reported lower.
I am not encouraging a more critical attitude to this work, and I just mention this phenomenon and hope to stimulate more discussions.