congenitally_deadpan

congenitally_deadpan t1_j4wqyo2 wrote

Interesting findings, but as the authors themselves discuss, the study has some significant limitations relative to the role of diabetes and possibly chronic pancreatitis, for example. So, as the saying goes, more study is needed.

In 1981 there was a highly publicized lead article in the New England Journal of Medicine showing an association between coffee consumption and pancreatic cancer, which, ultimately, could not be replicated. (Reportedly, it turned out the control group had an accidental bias - high rate of peptic ulcer disease and with individuals not drinking coffee for that reason.)

15

congenitally_deadpan t1_iujjewq wrote

I think they used this term because the study did not look at actual outcomes such as heart attacts, but instead measured blood tests that might indicate an "atherogenic profile" i.e. findings felt to correlate with risk of atherosclerotic disease.

12

congenitally_deadpan t1_isz7680 wrote

May be true for the cookie in question, but how many other foods might not need some additional ingredient(s) to hold the shape. Or, a cookie inside some other food. Hard to think of any healthy foods this could be applicable to.

−2

congenitally_deadpan t1_irs9xm9 wrote

Seems like the term "trigger word" itself is undergoing a transition.

Don't think it is a "trigger word" issue, it is just that someone likely felt that "blue space" sound so very up to date, 21st century, maybe even woke.

1

congenitally_deadpan t1_irs6t77 wrote

This sentence in the discussion gets to exactly what I was thinking as I read the study:

“Moreover, as in most preventive trials, our population resulted in being, through self-selection, enriched with healthy participants with high education and reserve, and low probability of cognitive decline, which left limited room for lifestyle changes and intervention-related improvements.”

The authors were using this to explain why they might not have seen as big an improvement as they thought they might find. I think it also suggests why it might not be very applicable to a broader range of elderly individuals at risk for dementia: They would likely lack sufficient motivation to stick with the program.

20