cforbinn

cforbinn t1_jbjbdp2 wrote

When considering a punishment, it seems logical that you need to take into consideration both parties, and future parties that may want to do this. He should not be made an example of. The punishment should be what is necessary to ensure this doesn’t happen again, but not greater than.

Edit: your statement can apply to any court case, any situation, and I hope you see that you are wrong for saying that.

−2

cforbinn t1_jbj2zkx wrote

I’m sure I’ll get downvoted for this. I agree he is a piece of shit, but does he deserve to lose his ability to care for his family. Does his family deserve to suffer for what he did? The difference between what he did and the consequences don’t match. He said words and maybe got richer off them, but him saying what he did, didn’t make the families he spoke about lose their ability to live.

Maybe they should find out how much he maybe off of sandy hook propaganda and make him pay that much to the families. I don’t know, doesn’t seem like the punishment matches the crime.

−13