Submitted by calbhollo t3_11a4zuh in singularity
calbhollo
calbhollo OP t1_j2ap1df wrote
Reply to comment by spudmix in ELI5: What does Prior mean when used as a noun? by calbhollo
Oh yeah I wasn't expecting you to read it, just answering the question of where it came from, don't worry haha. I think I understood most everything, anyways.
calbhollo OP t1_j2aksnj wrote
Reply to comment by spudmix in ELI5: What does Prior mean when used as a noun? by calbhollo
I don't know if links are allowed, but the post is "Why I think strong general AI is coming soon" by porby, on LessWrong.
calbhollo OP t1_j2akhny wrote
Reply to comment by spudmix in ELI5: What does Prior mean when used as a noun? by calbhollo
Thanks! That helps.
Submitted by calbhollo t3_zzaetu in explainlikeimfive
calbhollo t1_j265luw wrote
Reply to comment by Mountain-Award7440 in Vulture: Soon You’ll Be Able to Make Your Own Movie With AI by EnomLee
I've been calling AI movies and games for over a decade now, don't take that accomplishment from me! I need it!
calbhollo t1_j1y7yi9 wrote
Reply to comment by Calm_Bonus_6464 in Weird question, are there any well-known AI researchers with a leftist view? by [deleted]
Do you know any specific names from Europe? I'm hoping even some translations might help me see a different perspective from the American researchers.
calbhollo t1_j1wsqwp wrote
Reply to comment by TouchCommercial5022 in Which Sci-fi book/Movie/Short Story has technology closest to something in our future. (What would be your guess) by Ortus12
The problem with the idea of cyberpunk is that it pretends that capitalism can keep on going at all, when AI is going to replace ALL work within the next decade or two. How can we have cyberpunk if there's literally no work left? On the one hand, that makes Cyberpunk overly cynical, as capitalism might end due to our inability to work. On the other hand, it might not be cynical enough, as those in control of the AI work to hoard all the production of the world, and let everyone else starve to death from the inability to produce under this new system.
I am worried too, but treating art as if it's the only thing that's going to be replaced is not correct.
calbhollo t1_j1t1yix wrote
Reply to Will the singularity require political revolution to be of maximum benefit? If so, what ideas need to change? by OldWorldRevival
Absolutely. There is no way that AGI isn't a force of pure destruction if it's built under a capitalist system. THere's also no way for us to slow down and not create a misaligned ASI under our system. We need change, and we need it quickly.
calbhollo t1_j1e35tq wrote
So far, this feels like a fight between 2 groups of pro-capitalists: Those who believe IP law is something that needs to be made stronger, instead of abolished, and those who are okay with corporations controlling our future.
Unfortunately, the rest of us are being harmed by both of their antics.
calbhollo t1_j3e52fq wrote
Reply to comment by ElvinRath in Now that’s pretty significant! (By Anthropic) by MajorUnderstanding2
"Brevity is the soul of wit" applies strongly to LLMs. The smarter the AI is, the less tokens you need to give it to think. We'll eventually have a brief AI, but right now, they aren't smart enough for that.