cajloapo
cajloapo t1_j42jpak wrote
Reply to comment by Banea-Vaedr in In MA, single women over 65 are more economically vulnerable than in any other state. Housing cost is a major factor. by Creative_Law_1484
It’s piddly twiddly widdly winks
Festering capitalism and wealth inequality blow that out of the water, you’re just spinning wheels on bandaid concessions. It helps maybe short term but not much overall
Bernie was right
This is is hostile society that half of the people here push forth just because they bought into the idea that they need to hollow their humanhood out so the wealthy asshole can get 5 more jets or sports cars
cajloapo t1_j42hpxx wrote
Reply to comment by Banea-Vaedr in In MA, single women over 65 are more economically vulnerable than in any other state. Housing cost is a major factor. by Creative_Law_1484
Why do you all act like piddly housing will even touch the monstrosity that is wealth inequality and systemic greed?
Extra housing is good but you’re chasing your tail by focusing primarily on that as a solution
cajloapo t1_j42dqlx wrote
Reply to comment by Banea-Vaedr in In MA, single women over 65 are more economically vulnerable than in any other state. Housing cost is a major factor. by Creative_Law_1484
Yeah! Jusssss wan more city! 🥴 More toxic capitalism will fix it!
Or you know, just basic safety nets and social services
You’re all that brainwashed aren’t you 🙄 boomer mindset go home. Ya done.
cajloapo t1_j42le6k wrote
Reply to comment by Banea-Vaedr in In MA, single women over 65 are more economically vulnerable than in any other state. Housing cost is a major factor. by Creative_Law_1484
OkBoomer
Social safety nets and capping obscene inequality isn’t that but we all know hyperbole is all you enablers have
You’re your own captives. But hey at least your feelings feel special when you say that emotional stuff right?