> “There have been roughly 10,000 claims considered since 2008,” wrote league spokesman Brian McCarthy. “Even if those less than a dozen cases were improperly decided — and they were not — the less than one dozen cases hardly amount to a pattern.”
This seems like a pretty brazen statement. Shouldn't a single case be cause for serious concern? Shouldn't the standard be never improperly rejecting legitimate healthcare claims?
c0wpig t1_j7so28c wrote
Reply to comment by washingtonpost in How the NFL avoids paying disabled players — with the union’s help by washingtonpost
> “There have been roughly 10,000 claims considered since 2008,” wrote league spokesman Brian McCarthy. “Even if those less than a dozen cases were improperly decided — and they were not — the less than one dozen cases hardly amount to a pattern.”
This seems like a pretty brazen statement. Shouldn't a single case be cause for serious concern? Shouldn't the standard be never improperly rejecting legitimate healthcare claims?