bohreffect
bohreffect t1_j9uy9ko wrote
Reply to comment by Additional-Escape498 in [D] To the ML researchers and practitioners here, do you worry about AI safety/alignment of the type Eliezer Yudkowsky describes? by SchmidhuberDidIt
>What about when ChatGPT
I mean, we're facing even more important dilemas right now, with ChatGPT's saftey rails. What is it allowed to talk about, or not? What truths are verbotten?
If the plurality of Internet content is written by these sorts of algorithms, that have hardcoded "safety" layers, then dream of truly open access to information that was the Internet will be that much closer to death.
bohreffect t1_j9l9eb2 wrote
Reply to comment by patricide1st in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
It's amazing how quickly people impute value judgement.
bohreffect t1_j9ktmj8 wrote
Reply to comment by Youvebeeneloned in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
I'm not disputing this?
I'm literally just taking the stance of "if you're taking bets on the current Justice cohort"
bohreffect t1_j9kqwtr wrote
Reply to comment by Youvebeeneloned in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
Usually as the result of "congress needs to create new legislation for this to be constitutional"
bohreffect t1_j9kkdrp wrote
Reply to comment by vwb2022 in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
You can safely bet most rulings from a conservative court will be "Congress needs to make a law"
bohreffect t1_iz7eg8v wrote
Reply to comment by IDe- in [R] The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [Geoffrey Hinton] by shitboots
Fair enough
bohreffect t1_iz74sa2 wrote
Reply to comment by IDe- in [R] The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [Geoffrey Hinton] by shitboots
But to imply backprop is getting old neglects all of the real world applications that haven't been pushed yet.
I understand there are problems where differentiability is an intractable assumption but saying "oh old thing how gauche" isn't particularly constructive.
bohreffect t1_iz6j2xr wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [R] The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [Geoffrey Hinton] by shitboots
The Jacobian of the solution of a constrained optimization program with respect to its parameters, but I thought that was understood amongst the towering intellect of neural network afficiandos, e.g. the original commenter finding backprop to be stale.
Here's the stochastic programming version: Section 3.3. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/3fc2c60b5782f641f76bcefc39fb2392-Paper.pdf
bohreffect t1_iz6emfb wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [R] The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [Geoffrey Hinton] by shitboots
I mean, can you not compute the Jacobian of a constrained optimization program and stack that into any differentiable composition of functions?
People snoozin'.
bohreffect t1_iz3gn0s wrote
Reply to comment by IDe- in [R] The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [Geoffrey Hinton] by shitboots
You're sleeping on differentiable programming then
bohreffect t1_it7t2re wrote
Reply to comment by tell-me-the-truth- in [D] AAAI 2023 Reviews by CauseRevolutionary59
When I was a grad student I got the review requests directly. I'd venture my reviews were probably better than my professor's---he's write 2-3 sentences at most.
bohreffect t1_jcgcr96 wrote
Reply to In your experience, are AI Ethics teams valuable/effective? [D] by namey-name-name
Seeing who constitutes high profile names in "AI Ethics", having watched individual debacles unfold in the industry over the last few years, it doesn't instill confidence that they're particularly valuable. It's very, very hard not to have cynical takes about the people bubbling to the top.
In general I don't think unaccountable focus groups of people are the best moral arbiters either. In this instance I feel we have to go with our least worst option deferring to the wisdom of crowds.