blacklite911
blacklite911 t1_j6frmof wrote
Can someone explain why this is Oniony?
Seems like a standard copyright lawsuit
blacklite911 t1_j26rsu6 wrote
Reply to comment by syl3n in An A.I. Pioneer on What We Should Really Fear by jormungandrsjig
How to upgrade to the full version and is it available on the Pirate Bay?
blacklite911 t1_izmqryp wrote
Reply to comment by nightcrawleress in “Being Madame is a miserable job” Liselotte of the Palatinate lived at the court of the French king Louis XIV and wrote countless letters that offer a unique insight into the intrigues and everyday life of the nobility. by swissnationalmuseum
So she was basically like Cersei Lannister when King Rob was alive. Except for the bit about having a less plotting family
blacklite911 t1_iw85gwo wrote
Reply to comment by matti-san in Italy make history with first ever win against Australia by paloaltissimo
Why not though. It’s not good that other countries win?
blacklite911 t1_iw85cq2 wrote
Reply to comment by iama_bad_person in Italy make history with first ever win against Australia by paloaltissimo
Maybe the world is catching up???
blacklite911 t1_j6j4iee wrote
Reply to comment by IAmTheClayman in Rick Astley sues Yung Gravy over alleged Never Gonna Give You Up imitation by redlightist
I think he might have a case though. It’s basically like imitating his likeness. Instead of hiring Astley to record new material, they basically either altered a voice or got a soundalike to adds extra material to the song. The argument is that song song gives you the impression that it’s Rick Astley singing the new lines. The implications could be important for the future. Because deepfake vocal technology can actually allow labels to produce new material in the sound of a singer’s voice.
It basically hinges on if the song leads the typical person to believe that Rick Astley is singing the new lines.
So I believe it’s more complicated than the initial reaction. He has a case