bekilledoff
bekilledoff t1_j8qjwus wrote
Reply to comment by DKNinjas in Microsoft's AI Bing also factually wrong, fabricated text during launch demo by GroundbreakingTap626
Ugh. Well put, but damn is that a depressing synopsis...
bekilledoff t1_j60p83b wrote
We're taking a huge Gambit with these AI Rogues
(xmen pun)
bekilledoff t1_j60p5t0 wrote
Rogue Asteroids
Rogue Nations
Now we have Rogue AI
The danger is all these damned rogues!
bekilledoff t1_j0vfq7j wrote
Reply to comment by LaddyPup in FTX founder Bankman-Fried sent back to Bahamas jail in day of courtroom chaos -CNBC by wander9077
ah ok. i have not followed the story, just a name in headlines lately
bekilledoff t1_j0ve0sv wrote
Reply to FTX founder Bankman-Fried sent back to Bahamas jail in day of courtroom chaos -CNBC by wander9077
is there some significance to his suit? I don't understand why it's mentioned at all
bekilledoff t1_iyfdqp5 wrote
I know everything on the internet sounds like it's trolling, but this is actually the philosophical underpinning of fascism (as a political philosophy)
bekilledoff t1_ivpaikv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in New study (n=276) finds that a standardized mindfulness program is as effective as a common antidepressant (Escitalopram) at treating anxiety, with both treatments leading to about a 30% reduction in symptoms. by fotogneric
the value in studies like this is establishing empirical data for the clinical efficacy for the newer treatment. the antidepressants were already proven to be effective, and mindfulness as a treatment modality is relatively new in Western mental health care.
some people are allergic to certain drugs. some people need medication and can't practice mindfulness skills.
it's good that both treatment options are effective
bekilledoff t1_iugiwbk wrote
Neat alternative theory for the noose. I'd never considered that Blair was transformed while in captivity. Makes sense and like many things in the film, we'll never know the truth lol
bekilledoff t1_iuggwv9 wrote
Reply to ELI5: How do plants know that they will be eaten and therefore their seeds will be spread and regrow? by HazeThere
Accident.
You're projecting intention onto what is an evolutionary process, which is a sequence of adaptations adopted over time, without intention behind it, i.e., by accident (i.e., because a thing happened to have a trait that helped it survive and reproduce).
bekilledoff t1_iu9cz7u wrote
Reply to A girl leaving her boyfriend for a guy with a bigger dick is the same as a guy leaving his girlfriend for one with bigger boobs. by [deleted]
Sexual compatibility is entirely subjective to the two people involved. If they are not compatible then it makes sense to end it.
There's a whole chapter of the Kama Sutra about compatibility between people based on their genitalia sizes (here's a short summary). I'm not saying the Sutras are right, but it might give some perspective to notice that people around the world have been aware of the importance of sexual compatibility for thousands of years.
Long story short: men and women come with different sizes of junk and compatibility does matter. There's someone for everyone, but not anyone can be with anyone - even guys with huge cocks get turned down for being too big sometimes, too.
bekilledoff t1_iu7p351 wrote
Now think about the film artifacts of the last 20-40 years of cinema. What monsters will have tons of cultural cache in another 50 years?
Will it still be Dracula and the Wolfman and Frankenstein? Or will new "Universals" take the podiums?
I'm nominating Hannibal Lecter to replace Dracula. Maybe the Terminator will replace Frankenstein... It's fun to imagine the pop culture of the future this way...
bekilledoff t1_j9h4qgu wrote
Reply to I know nothing about the roman empire. Will i understand Gladiator? by [deleted]
You will love the movie and you'll end up knowing even less about Rome !
(this is a joke about the film's historical inaccuracies, not a dig)