barlog123
barlog123 t1_ivo8uny wrote
Reply to comment by Staeff in More people are employed in clean energy than in fossil fuels by kickresume
Yeah, why not.
- The production and demand just shifts to other places so going green does very little in the grand scheme of things.
- Creates reliance on outdated unclean oil/gas/coal infrastructure and rouge nations especially in the case of an emergency.
- The net total reduction is minimalized by the need for backup until the battery tech is there.
barlog123 t1_ivo6s41 wrote
Reply to comment by Staeff in More people are employed in clean energy than in fossil fuels by kickresume
How? They all have to be backed up with gas and coal because they're unreliable so it's renewable + gas/coal which isn't very green
barlog123 t1_ivo5bi7 wrote
Reply to comment by Staeff in More people are employed in clean energy than in fossil fuels by kickresume
They can't just be jobs they need to be productive jobs that add value otherwise you're subsidizing waste and inefficiency
barlog123 t1_ivoa06d wrote
Reply to comment by Staeff in More people are employed in clean energy than in fossil fuels by kickresume
I'm not saying don't go green. I'm saying the current plan is beyond stupid and pointless