banjomin

banjomin t1_itqs9aj wrote

Reply to comment by the_honeyman in Vote NO on Question #1 by [deleted]

You’re not even arguing against anything I said. I told you it was dishonest to act like the apartment buildings aren’t the main thing in this proposed development plan.

Now you’re just ranting about nimbys.

4

banjomin t1_itqib00 wrote

Reply to comment by the_honeyman in Vote NO on Question #1 by [deleted]

Weird and dishonest that you’re talking as though the corporate owned housing is not the main thing for this ballot question.

Like you know why it sucks but wanna pretend like that’s not gonna be a big part of the development, even though the corporate-owned housing is, again, the whole reason we’re voting on it.

8

banjomin t1_itqh50e wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Vote NO on Question #1 by [deleted]

Kind of dishonest to frame it like this would help those without housing. Homeless people are not going to be living in any boutique apartments across from sequiota park.

I get the logic of freeing up cheaper units, but that’s just supply-side economics that can also justify other awful things.

13