The "worst case scenario" in this case is being deliberately expanded for the profit of private investment funds.
Nobody has insurance that covers more than a small percentage of "out of network" claims.
The courts are siding with the investors charging a 700% markup for an air ambulance ride and refusing to join any insurance networks and negotiate.
So is it the "worst case scenario"? Sure. It's also going to be the most common scenario soon, if it's not already. All that 700% profit buys allows them to buy up any outfit that's charging reasonable rates.
avidiax t1_iuartbi wrote
Reply to comment by Boogerchair in A Colorado train passenger looked out the window - and found a missing hiker. by inkwater
The "worst case scenario" in this case is being deliberately expanded for the profit of private investment funds.
Nobody has insurance that covers more than a small percentage of "out of network" claims.
The courts are siding with the investors charging a 700% markup for an air ambulance ride and refusing to join any insurance networks and negotiate.
So is it the "worst case scenario"? Sure. It's also going to be the most common scenario soon, if it's not already. All that 700% profit buys allows them to buy up any outfit that's charging reasonable rates.