The problem is, people (especially professors) are going to look for it no matter what.
Just look at the stats. Roberta OpenAI detector was downloaded a whopping 114k times in just last month. It clearly states not to use it as ChatGPT detector but I see a lot of it's implementations
Better to educate users with a big fat disclaimer and a tool
I'm totally aware of that and I will be putting a disclaimer in front page, not buried in a Terms and Conditions link somewhere.
The tools currently available can ruin a student's life by not explicitly mentioning it.
I want to address that issue by providing a solution that comes at top of the search and informing professors about limitations as explicitly as possible
ateqio OP t1_j8hcsz6 wrote
Reply to comment by andreichiffa in [D] Looking for recommendations for an affordable API service to classify AI-generated text by ateqio
What's the ratio of false positives? honestly curious