allnamestaken1968
allnamestaken1968 t1_j6lkdlh wrote
Reply to comment by BellyScratchFTW in The amount of people that do not know that a cold sore is herpes is surprising. by BellyScratchFTW
Maybe. 66% of the population have herpes simplex, but it doesn’t really show for most
allnamestaken1968 t1_j6klsrw wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Swedish start-up is building an electric airliner. Will this be the future of Airlines? by Max_1990
So far, we don’t have battery packs that have the energy density, max output, fast charging, and longevity that would allow for anything in passenger flight. It just doesn’t exist. “Replacing batteries every few cycles” sounds horribly expensive. You would also have a range approved based on battery life. You need distance+circling+ going to other airport plus at one go around. It just isn’t going to happen with any battery tech we know of, and it’s unlikely for hydrogen planes with more than about 20 people for about 200 miles
allnamestaken1968 t1_j5akb92 wrote
Reply to comment by DisasterousGiraffe in Successful test flight of Hydrogen-Electric Airplane could be key to zero-carbon flying. Aim for commercial 700 mile flight with 40-80 seater aircraft by 2027. by DisasterousGiraffe
This is not scheduled commercial operation with massive freight into major airports with requirements for holding and deviation and redundancies. Not comparable
allnamestaken1968 t1_j58j8gq wrote
Reply to Successful test flight of Hydrogen-Electric Airplane could be key to zero-carbon flying. Aim for commercial 700 mile flight with 40-80 seater aircraft by 2027. by DisasterousGiraffe
The timelines are such BS. Even for freight for commercial flight, the certification takes a long time, and they do t have anything close to anything that would work commercially for 300 miles plus taxi plus circle plus deviation plus safety - and they can’t get around that requirement for anything “commercial”. Funny enough the infrastructure could be there if you do point to point and slowly build it out. If you deviate you are a bit screwed obviously - tankers here we come
As for 50 seats by 2027 - nope. For passenger, you need redundancy approved and certified in systems that dont exist yet - like fuel cells that can provide the needed power or even the electric motors. Also likely not possible with existing airframes- so forget that.
allnamestaken1968 t1_j2abtbr wrote
Reply to comment by Hamoodzstyle in [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
Correct. And some companies have so much cash they put some in longer term investments - for example, a non liquid bond. If you don’t plan to sell, that shows up in long term assets. Was the case when Apple has hundreds of billions for example
allnamestaken1968 t1_j2a6e4k wrote
Reply to comment by GangNailer in [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
That’s not what I meant. Sorry. Obviously that would work - but in the end, it’s a market for labor. I am for minimum wage $25 plus inflation - but that wouldn’t change this as nobody at Apple makes that little (well, maybe some janitors, but not enough to change this picture). Companies will be profit/cash flow maximizing under the rules allowed. A cash machine like Apple will always generate more cash than they can reasonably invest in new businesses
allnamestaken1968 t1_j2a0m5p wrote
Reply to comment by Hamoodzstyle in [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
Anything they plan to sell (rather than hold for the longer term). So think so. Point is that it’s liquid almost like cash and in financial analysis you always look at “cash and marketable securities”
allnamestaken1968 t1_j29noti wrote
Reply to comment by GangNailer in [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
This is also a fundamental misunderstanding of what buybacks do. Do you think dividends enrich investors undeservedly? Same thing.
allnamestaken1968 t1_j29nf2i wrote
Reply to comment by GangNailer in [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
This is however not how business works. I am pretty sure Apple Pay’s pretty well. As for r&d, they spent a shitload already. And you don’t want to start another series of conglomerates like we had in the 70s and 80s, when utilities owned malls and rental car companies. That’s not good for anybody. Lastly, you would also have to stop special dividends, which is not not going to happen. Basically buybacks are a good way to return to cash to shareholders to reinvest in other companies.
allnamestaken1968 t1_j294t84 wrote
Reply to comment by GangNailer in [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
And what should they do with the money? They don’t have the management capacity to invest it. The alternative is dividends, which is way less tax optimization for investors (since you have to take it). Buybacks by themselves do not increase share price anyways.
allnamestaken1968 t1_j294j1f wrote
Reply to [OC] Apple’s cash flow statement visualized by giteam
The marketable securities should be added to the cash balance. It’s just a short term vehicle to park cash. So that 135.7 increased cash and marketable securities balance
allnamestaken1968 t1_j6lkud8 wrote
Reply to The amount of people that do not know that a cold sore is herpes is surprising. by BellyScratchFTW
Important to know the difference between herpes simplex (cold sores) and hsv-2, genital herpes. You can get hsv 2 from oral sex with somebody who has hsv 1 only when the sores are visible (simplifying here, exceptions seem to apply recently). Otherwise it’s really hard to get the Herpes everybody knows about (genital, 10-15% of population) from hsv1 (cold sores, about 2/3 of the population with the virus, many show no symptoms)
Some good meds for hsv 1 are available, mostly creams that make the sores go away quicker.
Good article: https://www.cdc.gov/std/herpes/stdfact-herpes-detailed.htm#:~:text=How%20common%20is%20genital%20herpes,States%20in%20a%20single%20year.&text=Nationwide%2C%2011.9%20%25%20of%20persons%20aged,%25%20when%20adjusted%20for%20age).