affinepplan

affinepplan t1_iyiiq99 wrote

On the MIT team, definitely. It's about half grad students and half undergrads.

On the Cambridge Community Gymnastics (CCG) team it skews ~slightly older, but still I think most members are under 35 or so, and there are definitely plenty of 20-somethings. I list both because they share the space a lot, and CCG practices would frequently overlap with the last 30min of the MIT team practice.

I can also guarantee it's a very beginner friendly space and many participants have zero experience. Going to competitions is encouraged (and fun!) but definitely not required.

The commute might get old over time, but if adult gymnastics is something you're interested in I'd recommend giving it a shot for at least a few weeks and meet the people to see if you vibe with them.

3

affinepplan t1_iwsalyf wrote

It depends on the exact implementation.

A common one internationally is called "open-list." You vote for a candidate and your vote counts for both that candidate and for their party.

Seats are awarded to parties based on how many votes they get, then parties send candidates to fill those seats based on how many votes each candidate in the party got.

Alternatively could be implemented as STV, which is used in Cambridge, MA and Minneapolis, is also used in a number of cities in AU, NZ, Scotland, and Wales, and just passed ballot initiatives for future use in Portland, ME and Portland, OR. That version has voters rank candidates (without necessarily any regard for parties) and then selects winners proportionally based on the rankings.

2

affinepplan t1_iwsa9l0 wrote

Shortest splitline is a clever gimmick but probably not super useful for real life. Sometimes there really are natural (e.g. rivers, mountainsides, etc. etc.) or cultural boundaries that should be respected.

Better would be to get rid of single-seat districts entirely and elect representatives using proportional representation. This is the only way to conclusively eliminate gerrymandering

8