WhatsThatNoize
WhatsThatNoize t1_itvkhq6 wrote
Reply to comment by platoprime in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Variations of location, time, and relative velocity are immaterial to objective reality. They're not "subjective truths", they're second-order measurements.
I'm well aware of special relativity Mr. 200 IQ.
WhatsThatNoize t1_itvhz3n wrote
Reply to comment by platoprime in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Variations over time aren't "subjective truth", what even are you saying, my dude?
WhatsThatNoize t1_itvgmzm wrote
Reply to comment by platoprime in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
Truth in that framework is entirely meaningless.
Big oof.
WhatsThatNoize t1_itvwojf wrote
Reply to comment by platoprime in Logical positivism does not dispense with metaphysics, as it aimed to. It merely proposes a different kind of metaphysics, in which natural sciences take the privileged position once occupied by rationalist metaphysics. by IAI_Admin
No, you're just attributing a meaningless distinction to an important one.
> If differences in frames of reference weren't material to objective reality they would be unnecessary to describe objective reality.
You're entirely forgetting that you're talking about a mathematical MODEL of reality.