WallyMetropolis
WallyMetropolis t1_jc564sn wrote
Reply to How To Scale Transformers’ Memory up to 262K Tokens With a Minor Change? by rezayazdanfar
Calling your own work 'fabulous' is a little unusual.
WallyMetropolis t1_j2wu5pt wrote
Reply to comment by jason_square in Look on the dark side | We must keep the flame of pessimism burning: it is a virtue for our deeply troubled times, when crude optimism is a vice by ADefiniteDescription
It's not remotely denialism and it's not at all hiding. Activists are by their nature optimists because they believe change is possible.
WallyMetropolis t1_j2wt95s wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Look on the dark side | We must keep the flame of pessimism burning: it is a virtue for our deeply troubled times, when crude optimism is a vice by ADefiniteDescription
But it's only a contradiction if it's saying that extremist version. Unless I claimed that everyone was a pessimist, and only optimists can make progress, then noting that progress has been made isn't a contradiction.
WallyMetropolis t1_j2tu5av wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Look on the dark side | We must keep the flame of pessimism burning: it is a virtue for our deeply troubled times, when crude optimism is a vice by ADefiniteDescription
You are reading my comment as saying that 100% of everyone thought it was the end times and also that 100% of all progress is made by optimists. That's not what I think and any person making any kind of attempt at a generous reading would never assume that's what I think.
I'm saying that the person claiming that all of human history was marked by prevalent, toxic optimism is incorrect. That's not the case. Historically, cynicism has always been extremely popular. I'm also claiming that optimists are generally more effective and bringing about progress.
WallyMetropolis t1_j2tpoz1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Look on the dark side | We must keep the flame of pessimism burning: it is a virtue for our deeply troubled times, when crude optimism is a vice by ADefiniteDescription
No, that would be a weird over-generalization. I'm just contesting the idea that history was defined by broad optimism, or that optimism has been a constantly, hugely popular position for people right up until the present moment. That's false.
And I'm also saying there's value in optimism.
WallyMetropolis t1_j2tmnqg wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Look on the dark side | We must keep the flame of pessimism burning: it is a virtue for our deeply troubled times, when crude optimism is a vice by ADefiniteDescription
It's pretty simple. There have always been optimists, and cynicism has always been popular.
WallyMetropolis t1_j2sxjmr wrote
Reply to comment by monkeylogic42 in Look on the dark side | We must keep the flame of pessimism burning: it is a virtue for our deeply troubled times, when crude optimism is a vice by ADefiniteDescription
Nonsense. Humans have been convinced they are living in the end times at every point in history. Doom and gloom has always been the popular stance.
If people don't believe progress is possible, they won't work towards it.
WallyMetropolis t1_jc6qi9w wrote
Reply to comment by rezayazdanfar in How To Scale Transformers’ Memory up to 262K Tokens With a Minor Change? by rezayazdanfar
I see. Typically, when you say "this thing" you're referring to the most recent mention of that thing. So "Here's my article. This article is fabulous." is probably not the structure you want. You really should reference the paper or the researchers you're writing about straight away, if that's what you're doing here. Even after skimming your article, that isn't clear.
It's a cautionary tale about "this" really. A tip that has helped my writing is to accumulate a list of words that I tend to over-use that add nothing and search for them in the editing process. Words like "this, really, just, again," and so on.