WET318
WET318 t1_ivgg7sj wrote
Reply to comment by LittleTXBigAZ in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
I don't understand how that's a cop out answer. If the company is able to hire people that will put up with what you're not willing to put up with, then you're shit out of luck. The market value dictates everything. Look at the current market for employees. It's crazy how expensive employees are right now. But, that's the current market value of basic labor.
WET318 t1_ivgfh8d wrote
Reply to comment by LittleTXBigAZ in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
I mean you can still sue. The company would just lose the lawsuit in this case.
WET318 t1_ivgfa81 wrote
Reply to comment by cheepcheepimasheep in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
If they breach the contract, yes. Of course.
WET318 t1_ivgeuo2 wrote
Reply to comment by MacDerfus in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
There most certainly can be.
WET318 t1_ivf8ogb wrote
Reply to comment by LittleTXBigAZ in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
I don't see an issue with a company suing a union. If there is a breach of contract between the union and the company by the union, the company should be able to sue.
WET318 t1_ivgvdec wrote
Reply to comment by LittleTXBigAZ in U.S. rail union representing 4,900 workers narrowly approves contract by Banemorth
That's a fair point.