VordeMan

VordeMan t1_j09ik5r wrote

A lot of Murray's arguments break down completely when the LLM has been RLHF-ed, or otherwise finetuned (i.e., the case we care about), which is a bit shocking to me (did no one point this out?). I guess that's supposed to be the point of peer review :)

Given that fact, it's unclear to me how useful this paper is....

11