VSM1951AG
VSM1951AG t1_iu7id2q wrote
Reply to Controversial race researcher gets prestigious Cambridge University fellowship by hieronymusanonymous
This is a matter of science, not politics or what’s temporarily popular.
If this guy’s ideas are incorrect—and I don’t know enough about them to weigh in one way or another—then they are incorrect because the data of observation does not support his hypothesis, not because some people or groups find his ideas scandalous or inconvenient.
It’s a very dangerous thing to say that some ideas may never be raised, hypothesized, experimented, researched, talked about or written about. Just like with faith, we should question everything. That which is true will stand the test of close scrutiny. The scientific method is sufficient to handle any ideas that may come its way. Those who would attempt to censor, shout-down, disbar, or terminate people for asking questions and doing science are no friend to science.
VSM1951AG t1_itwiqax wrote
Reply to comment by SportySaturn in Women in high-status, senior positions aren't trusted by the people they work with, according to a new study by giuliomagnifico
Please go away, Democratic Bot. When your party finally fixes the schools, particularly in African American neighborhoods, we’ll talk. The Party of Slavery, the Confederacy, the KKK, and Jim Crow is in no position to blow trumpets about how great it is.
VSM1951AG t1_itvwkik wrote
Reply to comment by SportySaturn in Women in high-status, senior positions aren't trusted by the people they work with, according to a new study by giuliomagnifico
No. Again, I am not tribal. Some Democratic policies are better, and some Republican policies are better.
VSM1951AG t1_itueaff wrote
Reply to comment by SportySaturn in Women in high-status, senior positions aren't trusted by the people they work with, according to a new study by giuliomagnifico
Why did you make this about party politics? Did I say anything about party politics? No. I never mentioned either party.
Why would you assume, merely because I criticize a Democratic president and vice president, I’m automatically a Republican? (I’m not.) If I were a Democrat, would I be forbidden somehow from criticizing the current administration? I hope not, as millions of Democrats are as disgusted by our current leadership as I am.
What you’re engaged in is called tribalism. My Team vs. Your Team. “My Team is always awesome, and your team offers nothing of value. “. It’s a two-dimensional worldview, and it’s killing us. We need good ideas and great leaders from wherever we find them.
VSM1951AG t1_itsdkzi wrote
Reply to Women in high-status, senior positions aren't trusted by the people they work with, according to a new study by giuliomagnifico
Is ANYONE in positions of power trusted anymore? I can only think of one who, if exiled to a desert island, wouldn’t make the company I work for better.
Stupidity, rank hypocrisy, focusing on woke BS instead of efficiency, productivity, and profitability.
I mean look who’s running the country: a corrupt, senile dude who can’t do anything but read cue cards, and a high school girl who giggles and can’t put a cogent sentence together.
VSM1951AG t1_iu7wzgx wrote
Reply to comment by personAAA in Controversial race researcher gets prestigious Cambridge University fellowship by hieronymusanonymous
And if the data show evidence that that’s the case, so be it. Again, the fact that some get emotional is no reason not to do the science. There’s nothing unethical in doing legitimate science to determine whether such a link exists, or defending such, assuming sound methods.