Ukulele_Maestro
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j80bf8o wrote
Reply to comment by tanrgith in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Yeah I'd agree, and good thing the risk was taken back then, just as it's good to do so now with BO
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j80bb5j wrote
Reply to comment by robertojh_200 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
That's the point of this launch, to establish a track record
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j807jbv wrote
Reply to comment by wgp3 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Yeah blue origin will be losing money on this launch. Seems pretty good for NASA.
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7zsffu wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Then you should know also that starship could be a complete failure too.
But I get it. SpaceX good blue origin bad. That's the thought process around here.
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7zqrw0 wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Starship is further along in development in that a prototype exists, but yeah they are both under development.
Blue origin has spent a billion dollars on manufacturering facilities to build new Glenn. That to me shows they are serious about building it and we should see the first prototype rolling out sometime soon
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7zq68q wrote
Reply to comment by Good_Management7353 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Nah, blue origin bad SpaceX good. How dare they snub SpaceX or so goes the Elon simps in /r/space
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7zo1po wrote
Reply to comment by wgp3 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
The nuances of both are different but there are similarities, and it fits with NASA strategy of helping to foster the commercial launch industry.
it's definitely risky and a stretch to rely on starship for the moon lander, there are many untested capabilities that have to be developed. It's a developmental rocket, and got the contract.
Blue Glenn is similar in that it's a developmental rocket, and got the contract.
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7zdl29 wrote
Reply to comment by New_Poet_338 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
People are criticizing NASA for contracting blue origin and a developmental rocket, but apparently ok to look the other way for NASA contracting a developmental rocket for something of much higher consequence
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7zdb4y wrote
Reply to comment by dman2864 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Blue origin has as invested billions of dollars into the development of the Blue Glenn rocket.
It's going to become another player in the commercial launch industry and NASA wants that to happen.
I don't see any problem here
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7zczey wrote
Reply to comment by ChrisJD11 in Blue Origin awarded NASA launch contract for Mars mission (Studying magnetic field) by kuroimakina
Hmm.
NASA awarded pretty big contracts to spacex for lunar lander and starship. That's a platform under development and not at all proven yet.
Blue origin has a similar rocket, blue Glen. NASA wants more commercial launch providers, so a mission like this to cut the teeth of new Glen is a great thing.
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7uxcnq wrote
Reply to comment by fattybunter in SpaceX president/COO Gwynne Shotwell says they're attempting Starship's 33-engine static fire test tomorrow, Feb 9. by spsheridan
I'm with this guy. People need to be more realistic about starship, where it is in development, and the high likelihood there are going to be teething pains and developmental delays due to unforeseen technical issues arising.
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7ux4zq wrote
Reply to comment by Fredasa in SpaceX president/COO Gwynne Shotwell says they're attempting Starship's 33-engine static fire test tomorrow, Feb 9. by spsheridan
lol when did space become so polarized. There are the same such people rooting for SLS to fail because "insert reason"
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j7hc7pp wrote
Reply to comment by urmomaisjabbathehutt in Rolls-Royce Nuclear Engine Could Power Quick Trips to the Moon and Mars by darthatheos
reddit hivemind has a nuclear power boner
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j6uf7if wrote
Reply to comment by dirtballmagnet in NASA is funding ideas for a Titan seaplane and faster deep space travel by fchung
so a telescope that is using gravitational lensing, with a nuclear propulsion device to reach the required spot in 15 years.
you are right does sound like science fiction! Wild to think about this.
direct imaging of planets 100 light years away?! my god, I hope to live to see this.
Ukulele_Maestro t1_j6crnli wrote
Reply to comment by Bensemus in NASA's 'Mega Moon Rocket' aced first flight and is ready for crewed Artemis II launch by sasko12
Nothing has stopped SpaceX from doing so. It's a private company after all.
Ukulele_Maestro t1_ja94cbb wrote
Reply to I shot over 3600 one-second exposures to get my sharpest image of a galaxy to date by J3RRYLIKESCHEESE
The perspective of other galaxies like this shot blow my mind.
100's of million stars, planets all in that one little field of view. We could be looking at a million earth like planets right there for all we know. Does this galaxy have a name?
the vastness is just a total mind fuck.