ToadScoper

ToadScoper OP t1_je5wqdl wrote

Wu can't do anything, the T control board answers to the governor (which is a whole issue of its own). Baker created the control board to manage the T’s finances, management, and operations to ultimately "fix" the T. This idealism was thrown out of the window in 2021 when he appointed the current board, so we're left with a powerful board that does jack. Healey would need to directly intervene and appoint a new board or even create some form of new governance, which she seems totally uninterested in doing as of now.

21

ToadScoper OP t1_je5us92 wrote

The previous board was highly regarded and actually ran the T very well. They got capital projects such as the GLX and SCR back on track and even planned for commuter rail electrification. Any progress the previous board made was pulled back when the Baker-appointed board was put in charge in 2021.

5

ToadScoper OP t1_je5u6up wrote

Precisely- the 2021 control board was set for failure by Baker himself. He ordered the current board to be as hands-off and passive as possible to lower capital costs, and he got exactly that. Unfortunately, our current governor does not recognize this issue and has made no indication of appointing a new board.

7

ToadScoper OP t1_je5os92 wrote

The real issue with the T is the Baker-appointed control board which has failed the agency on every possible level since it was formed in 2021. Unfortunately, our governor does not recognize this, so even if the new manager is competent and transparent nothing will happen with the current board in charge. Imo appointing a new competent and proactive board is far more of a priority than a new gm

10

ToadScoper OP t1_je5nprn wrote

Austerity is not viable when nobody trusts a failing agency. Governance and management need to be restructured, and transparency needs to be restored with the public. A new manager is not going to solve anything if there are no other changes to T management. Only then will we might see the T get back on track, or at least to the point of it operating beyond the bare minimum

14

ToadScoper OP t1_je5ltpr wrote

Beyond funding, the MBTA needs way more than a new manager to fix its woes; it needs an entire governance restructuring that relieves the current hands-off Baker-appointed control board that has been more than a failure for operating the T as of recently. If the governor wants the T to be more transparent, it needs to appoint a proactive board of transit experts instead of the wet towels that currently occupy the board.

118

ToadScoper t1_je5ju0k wrote

The Pawtucket/Central Falls station is already incredibly popular. I believe this is due in part because the MBTA is dragging its feet on reconstructing the closed South Attleboro station which has led to many Attleboro/Seekonk-area commuters to use either downtown Attleboro or P/CF stations. The T really needs to fund the South Attleboro station rebuild to relieve future crowding and congestion at P/CF

1

ToadScoper t1_je1p0ys wrote

I’m really curious if anyone has encountered Frank Hassle, though it seems he has moved on from this area of the country

1

ToadScoper t1_jdi4pt7 wrote

Gansett (that being their standard old-school brew) is actually brewed in Rochester NY, so it's pretty popular in the Empire state. In recent years they have been brewing specialty beers at their brewery location in Providence as well as the Guild co-op in Pawtucket, such as their Fresh Catch and Dels shanty.

3

ToadScoper OP t1_j80d7bf wrote

The 195 commission has got to be the most delusional entity in the entire state; the commission is absolutely clueless and does not understand the immediate needs or priorities for new Providence developments. Going purely "commercial" is exceedingly misguided and ignores the immediate need for more equitable housing and mixed-use developments that the parcels should have been designated for ten years ago. And yes, you CAN have service industries in mix-use neighborhoods... just look at Boston or any other city...

26

ToadScoper t1_j6opypn wrote

What really needs to be done is regional rail, or at the very least more frequent trains on key corridors. While full electrification is required for true regional services, regional rails pilot could be implemented in the interim with more frequent diesel services on key corridors until electrification happens (I believe the previous MBTA control board considered this plan in 2021). A new off-board fare system is crucial to regional rail and really should be considered moving forward

1

ToadScoper t1_j6jrxlr wrote

Providence is one of the more car-centric cities in New England, the downtown is littered with poor land uses such as surface-level parking lots and stroads. That being said, there must be a better path for implementing pedestrian infrastructure. From what it looks like, the urban trail plan is very vague and non-committal; it will likely result in a loop of needless bureaucracy and dreaded "feasibility studies". It will take a lot more than painted bike shoulders to make the city a better environment for pedestrians

5