I was at 10/11 correct before I accidentally clicked back a page.
The one I did get wrong, I guessed that it was an AI, but it was real. The ones that were actually AI were still somewhat obvious.
Impressionist paintings are probably among the most difficult to tell the difference between because details that look "off" may just be part of the original impressionist design.
The most common things that tend to be "off"
- hands/ears
- Alphanumeric text
- common inanimate objects
It will definitely get to a point where its nigh impossible to tell, but not quite yet.
Thepookster t1_j1vt430 wrote
Reply to [P] Can you distinguish AI-generated content from real art or literature? I made a little test! by Dicitur
I was at 10/11 correct before I accidentally clicked back a page.
The one I did get wrong, I guessed that it was an AI, but it was real. The ones that were actually AI were still somewhat obvious.
Impressionist paintings are probably among the most difficult to tell the difference between because details that look "off" may just be part of the original impressionist design.
The most common things that tend to be "off"
- hands/ears
- Alphanumeric text
- common inanimate objects
It will definitely get to a point where its nigh impossible to tell, but not quite yet.