TheSeventhAnimorph

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_iy9siva wrote

I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not; your choices here are confusing for multiple reasons.

But in any case, That's My Bush! is a genuinely great show that holds up surprisingly well; I watched it for the first time just a few years ago. But I've never seen Lil' Bush.

2

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_iy9sbiu wrote

They almost certainly can't just unilaterally throw everything that was previously on one service onto another; the only options are probably to either shut down the MGM+ service and not have stuff on it available at all for a while or to renegotiate a lot of contracts before merging them. (They may still make contracts for new things like this to help justify the service's existence in the meantime, but with provisions that would allow the content to be moved once all the renegotiations are done.)

3

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_ixu4gqb wrote

> All the lists I found had reality tv, documentaries, anime and other stuff in it.

So? I'm sure some people do consider those to be "big" things that they'd be looking forward to; you're never going to find a list of "big" shows that everybody would agree on.

But this is the best list that I know of; I think it has almost everything in general, at least when it comes to American shows.

1

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_ixu4020 wrote

I mean, it obviously didn't have "absolutely no value," but sure, I definitely agree that it would only have been a very small part of the reason for it in comparison to other factors. And sure, they would have probably done it regardless, but the purchase amount would still likely have been at least a bit different.

5

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_ixu3tpm wrote

> But as long as Comcast owns a portion of Hulu they can't kill and have no option but to maintain that service.

I mean, technically they could sell their share to somebody else, whether Comcast or another entity entirely. (Comcast would probably work best, though, since Comcast's ability to force Disney to buy their share in 2024 would presumably still stand if not renegotiated.) But of course, they'd probably still have to wait out contracts for stuff that they already have with Hulu before they could pull everything.

1

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_ixt95y6 wrote

Not sure how much involvement he actually has as a producer now; TV shows that change to a new showrunner after the original creator has left entirely usually still give the creator a producer credit in basically an honorary sense. (I'm not saying that is necessarily the case there, but it happens fairly often.)

4

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_ixj78ub wrote

A show that's popular with Reddit's demographic is commonly posted about on a subreddit with thousands or even millions of people regularly visiting it? Who would have guessed? /s

If anything, I'm surprised there isn't even more stuff posted about things.

13

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_iw5hqux wrote

I don't think the vast majority of people on Reddit would consider just written profanity on its own to be NSFW. And if your post had an actual rating, there's zero chance it would be higher than PG-13, and some TV networks would probably borderline rate it TV-PG if it wasn't very inappropriate as a whole but was still clearly not a kids' show. (Think something like a broadcast network sitcom airing in syndication on a cable network.)

3

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_iw5haqr wrote

Honestly, it more than any other "celebrity" show I've ever known of has been able to get at least B-list celebrities pretty often (obviously not in every case, but a decent amount of the time); I've usually at least heard of most of the people on the show, which is more than I can say for any other show with "celebrity" contestants.

9

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_iw5h5kf wrote

Why is this NSFW?

But that aside, I don't actually watch it myself, but it does at least seem more interesting than most other "competition"-type shows; it seems to do way more to try to be somewhat different than anything else.

1

TheSeventhAnimorph t1_iupwi5j wrote

This is unironically the most logical way to resolve inconsistent multiverse depictions (for example, the MCU saying the Darkhold was destroyed in all universes when that isn't the case in the comics). All it takes to maintain consistency is for whoever says something affected all universes to have been an unreliable narrator, whether because they were just wrong and it really only affected some observable subset of universes or because they were lying for one reason or another.

1