TheLastSamurai

TheLastSamurai t1_iungi2c wrote

I disagree completely. You’re assuming rational actors. Have you seen American politics? It’s a disaster. Also, maybe some people don’t want their entire life revolved around AI, and with the social upheaval automation from narrow AI is about to rapidly cause from job replacement, who do you think they will come for? I say it’s very likely

0

TheLastSamurai OP t1_it68lrg wrote

Summary

We expect that there will be substantial progress in AI in the next few decades, potentially even to the point where machines come to outperform humans in many, if not all, tasks. This could have enormous benefits, helping to solve currently intractable global problems, but could also pose severe risks. These risks could arise accidentally (for example, if we don’t find technical solutions to concerns about the safety of AI systems), or deliberately (for example, if AI systems worsen geopolitical conflict). We think more work needs to be done to reduce these risks.

Some of these risks from advanced AI could be existential — meaning they could cause human extinction, or an equally permanent and severe disempowerment of humanity.2 There have not yet been any satisfying answers to concerns — discussed below — about how this rapidly approaching, transformative technology can be safely developed and integrated into our society. Finding answers to these concerns is very neglected, and may well be tractable. We estimate that there are around 300 people worldwide working directly on this.3 As a result, the possibility of AI-related catastrophe may be the world’s most pressing problem — and the best thing to work on for those who are well-placed to contribute....

3