TheDavidMichaels

TheDavidMichaels t1_j2j1s02 wrote

As I gaze into the future of artificial intelligence and technology, I can't help but envision a world where bio-borgs roam the streets. These beings, with their genetically modified organs and neural implants linked to combat computers on board, are the ultimate fusion of man and machine. It's becoming increasingly cost-effective to grow these enhanced organic components, rather than building them from scratch.

And as I study the state of the art in AI, I can't help but notice that human-neuron interfaces on chips seem to run AI particularly well. Perhaps it's because these interfaces are so similar to organic systems. As computing power advances and the scale gets smaller and smaller, I can't help but wonder if we will eventually see a future where tech is seamlessly embedded in the body, much like in the world of 'Altered Carbon' or 'Cyberpunk.' It's an exciting time to be alive, as the line between organic and inorganic blurs more and more each day

0

TheDavidMichaels t1_j2cesn8 wrote

It's always the same question: when we become lazy slaves to the machine overlords, how many times a day do you think they'll let us... well, you know? None!!

2

TheDavidMichaels t1_j2bzlri wrote

I agree with your direction of reasoning. It vexes me that many are looking at everything as if it's the end of the world or as if people are looking for some system to protect them from responsibility and work. Elon seems to think it's going to be a time where if you want to do something, you could, essentially giving the average billionaire the power to do anything. However, I just hear everyone worried about universal basic income (UBI). We saw what four months of UBI did, nearly destroying the earth. The COVID thing was a setup to get that going, but it failed due to expenses. I guess everyone will just have to work in the future. Personally, I'm looking forward to a future where an army of leased robots for Tesla sets up a floating island city near Bora Bora.

1

TheDavidMichaels t1_j27aeod wrote

It is natural for people to fear change, and technological advancements can often be met with concern and uncertainty. However, the history of technological progress has shown that, while there may be temporary disruptions, the overall impact of technological change has been positive, leading to increased productivity, economic growth, and improved standards of living for many people.

The Industrial Revolution, the rise of automation, and the rise of the internet and digital technologies are all examples of major technological revolutions that have had significant impacts on employment and economic growth. While these changes have certainly led to some job loss, they have also created new job opportunities and led to overall economic growth.

Looking towards the future, it is likely that technological change will continue to shape the job market and the economy. While it is important to consider and address any potential negative impacts, it is also important to recognize the potential benefits of technological change and to invest in education and training to ensure that people have the skills needed to succeed in a rapidly changing job market. Despite any temporary disruptions, technological progress has the potential to improve our lives and create a brighter future for all of us.

1

TheDavidMichaels t1_j278qdf wrote

UBI could discourage work and innovation: Some people may argue that UBI could reduce the incentive for individuals to work, since they would receive a regular income regardless of whether they are employed.
UBI could be difficult to implement and finance: Implementing UBI at a national or global level could be challenging, as it would require significant changes to existing systems and a large amount of funding.
UBI may not be the most effective way to address poverty: Some people may argue that other policies, such as targeted assistance programs or job training initiatives, could be more effective at reducing poverty and promoting economic security.
UBI could lead to inflation: If the amount of money distributed through UBI is not properly calibrated, it could lead to higher prices and inflation.
UBI could create disincentives for education and skill development: Some people may argue that UBI could reduce the incentive for individuals to invest in education or training, since they would receive a regular income regardless of their level of education or skills.
UBI could create disincentives for charitable giving: Some people may argue that UBI could reduce the incentive for individuals to donate to charitable causes, since they would receive a regular income regardless of their charitable contributions.
UBI could create resentment among certain groups: Some people may argue that UBI could create resentment among those who are working and paying taxes, since they would be required to subsidize the incomes of those who are not working.
UBI could create dependency: Some people may argue that UBI could create dependency among recipients, leading them to rely on the government for financial support rather than seeking employment or entrepreneurial opportunities.
UBI could lead to a reduction in social services: Some people may argue that implementing UBI could lead to a reduction in other social services, such as healthcare and education, as resources are redirected towards funding the basic income program.
UBI could be seen as unfair: Some people may argue that UBI is unfair, since it would provide the same level of support to those who are able-bodied and able to work as it would to those who are unable to work due to disability or other circumstances.

−2

TheDavidMichaels t1_j26u196 wrote

Listen, buddy, I'm not in the mood for your nonsense. First of all, the directors are good at politics and nothing else. Most of them sleep their way to the top, while the talented geniuses toil in labs for relatively low pay. The fact that you're shilling for the corporate media pretty much sums up the fact that you're either not very bright or just plain evil.

1

TheDavidMichaels t1_j26sxzw wrote

"So, despite all the supposed benefits of the singularity, everything goes wrong? That doesn't make sense. A more likely scenario is that with unlimited cheap labor and access to information, people could rent a robot like Elon's for just $2,000 per year, or buy one outright for $25,000, and start building anything they can imagine. New car? Check. New house? Check. Fusion reactor? Check. Army of anime sex bots on your own faster-than-light ship? Check. Why bother with all the negativity when you can just build whatever you want?"

8

TheDavidMichaels t1_j23xj9u wrote

As an artist with a boundless imagination, it's easy to see how an initial spark of inspiration could quickly evolve into a full-blown epic fantasy, worthy of 20 movies. And with the power of modern technology at our fingertips, it's not a stretch to envision a scenario where that initial spark is brought to life at a staggering 30 frames per second.

But let's take it a step further - what if we could not only bring this epic vision to life on the big screen, but also create a video game to accompany it? A thrilling tale of zombie-slaying heroes, braving the undead hordes alongside Brad Pitt to save the world from a zombie apocalypse. Based on the wildly popular "World War Z," this immersive, 3D narrative experience would transport players into the heart of the action, just like the legendary holodecks of "Star Trek" fame.

And all of this could happen in just a week's time, with the finished product debuting in theaters and making you rich beyond your wildest dreams. It may sound like a tall order, but with the right vision and determination, anything is possible. So, let's get to work on making this epic fantasy a reality!

1

TheDavidMichaels t1_j1vtii7 wrote

I think it laughable how as soon as we invent something new , out of the wood work come "Can we Ban" if you are asking me fuck no!! People like this would have everyone living in caves so they can maintain so tiny perceived advantage. it sinking.

1