TheCloudBoy

TheCloudBoy OP t1_j9h8bup wrote

I'm glad the post is useful! This is the serious drawback of weather apps, it's info (usually a garbage, single model forecast) compressed into a few numbers and icons. My company is working out ways to bridge this gap, seeing how folks on Reddit respond to posts like this is helping.

20

TheCloudBoy OP t1_j9fhnyv wrote

Reply to comment by KrissaKray in The Snow Hype Returns by TheCloudBoy

The perks of a pseudo-stationary snow band with higher snow ratios! I'm not sure which outlet is giving you a forecast of 8" for Thursday, but unless you live in the Whites it's best to totally ignore that trash forecast (very likely the European operational) and stick with my outlook here. As expected, the majority of guidance now favors warm air even further north and brings rain into most of southern NH, we'll be lucky to squeeze out 3-4" south.

2

TheCloudBoy OP t1_j9fd8c6 wrote

Reply to comment by kitchinsink in The Snow Hype Returns by TheCloudBoy

Ahhh the Kuchera ratio lol. That's a good question! My answer is no one model individually, though I do have a preferred model forecast for snow called positive snow depth change, or PSDC.

PSDC accounts for surface temperature, snow growth, precipitation types, compaction, etc. to provide a more realistic representation of how much snow a person will measure. When you compare the 12Z HRRR Kuchera & PSDC data, it should become immediately apparent that there's a notable difference in the Lakes Region where above-freezing air may surge all the way north to. The snow ratios in the White Mountains north of this heavy snow band will be pretty impressive, I can easily see 12-16" above 1,500 feet

1

TheCloudBoy OP t1_j9fb1tq wrote

Reply to comment by druebleam in The Snow Hype Returns by TheCloudBoy

Yeah the pattern in March is starting to look really interesting for the Northeast U.S., including all of New England. Models are hinting at a retrograding ridge into Greenland and a second persistent ridge in the Eastern Pacific through Alaska. That combination should squeeze much colder air in Canada south and provide the necessary blocking for our more classic, slow-moving Northeast U.S. snow storms.

3

TheCloudBoy OP t1_j9ddb5g wrote

There will be two shots at it! The first is light & right at the morning commute in/south of Durham. The second is more interesting and moves through just after sunset ahead of a vorticity plume, I like up to 0.5" out of that round

6

TheCloudBoy OP t1_j9czldg wrote

Reply to comment by ekob711 in The Snow Hype Returns by TheCloudBoy

If she and her group are adequately prepared, then I think that section of the hike isn't impossible. My main worry is actually blowing snow reducing visibility & obscuring trail markers. The girl Sotelo who perished on the Franconia Ridge succumbed to that exact issue.

7

TheCloudBoy t1_j9coozi wrote

Reply to comment by ginger2020 in Any one know? by twosquarewheels

"All callsigns on this net: this the Mt. Washington evac site. We're holding our own but have glassed enemies to the west on the cog railway, and are taking fire from that direction"

2

TheCloudBoy OP t1_j9cgt7f wrote

Reply to comment by ekob711 in The Snow Hype Returns by TheCloudBoy

Well given residual snow, gusty NW winds above the tree line, wind chills falling below -20°F in the afternoon, & trails potentially hard to navigate after fresh snow, my initial thought is she should wait. A few questions:

  1. What trail will she be on and what's the hut she's trying to reach?

  2. What time is she starting the hike on Friday?

7

TheCloudBoy t1_j91nkel wrote

I very much agree with CT DEEP's assessment that what we saw in CT is from other systems in the Southern Plains. Those particles lofted into the atmosphere are (depending on the exact size) very ideal as cloud condensation nuclei, which are particles that water vapor condenses to and form larger water droplets. These droplets then fall to the ground in larger storms, which we've seen a few times now. Given we've had a few predominant low-level SW flow regimes prior to this report, I'm even more convinced it's dust from the Plains.

2

TheCloudBoy t1_j8sb3sa wrote

The HYSPLIT modeling ARL offers allows you to run archived parcel trajectories and dispersion, I'm half-tempted to run one to see where all that smoke ended up.

I'll keep this next statement as apolitical as possible: multiple facets leading up to and during the response to this disaster should show all of us how corrupt entire agencies and the broader U.S. government have become, regardless of which party has control.

Look at how this train wasn't classified as carrying very hazardous materials, the arresting of local journalists covering the event, the complete silence by multiple federal agencies for nearly a week (eerily similar to the Soviet Union during Chernobyl), a failure to share critical information in a timely manner, covering for a private company clearly in the wrong (eerily similar to Japan covering TEPCO during Fukushima-Daiichi), I can keep going.

6

TheCloudBoy t1_j8s5wv1 wrote

I've had similar issues with the dissemination of critical information about this controlled burn from the beginning, the town hall in East Palestine last night was revealing and shows folks there are even more frustrated about this.

Let's focus on the HYSPLIT modeling I've shown and another pair of images released by NOAA ARL (Air Resources Laboratory) referenced in another post below. The moment this burn was ignited, ARL was supporting the local NWS forecast office and other government agencies by running a high-resolution HYSPLIT WRF nest over that burn. Essentially, as new info about the burn and weather analysis data came in, they were running new plume dispersion forecasts, likely at least 4 times a day but probably once an hour. None of these frequently updated data were readily visible to the public to my knowledge, which is totally unacceptable.

7