Thanos_nap
Thanos_nap OP t1_j62ytd9 wrote
Reply to comment by geldersekifuzuli in [P] Building a LSTM based model for binary classification by Thanos_nap
Thanks, will check this out 👍🏻
Thanos_nap OP t1_j62yrcn wrote
Reply to comment by guava-bandit in [P] Building a LSTM based model for binary classification by Thanos_nap
Yes, this is helpful. Thank you.
So to give you a idea of the actions, it has actions from our end and customer action (for marketing): Email / SMS / etc communication from our end Email open/sms clicked by customer
Transaction data actions: Bought x on date and time, bought y on date and time, etc.
All of it is arranged as per the timestamp of that action.
.fit() part I'm passing the data in same manner as you mentioned but not sure why the error is still there. Will check the tutorial someone else has posted!
Thanos_nap OP t1_j62nsnj wrote
Reply to comment by teenaxta in [P] Building a LSTM based model for binary classification by Thanos_nap
Oh yes customer ID will be dropped that was just for identification. As for why we need LSTM..that's because they just want it with LSTM because LSTM is the "new" thing here. That's all..i have explained them it's not really needed but obviously top management knows better.
Thanos_nap OP t1_j63dyc3 wrote
Reply to comment by vwings in [P] Building a LSTM based model for binary classification by Thanos_nap
There is a temporaral component. These customer actions are week wise. So the data is Customer ID, week number, action, converted yes or no.
I can get this in the 3d shape with time step as week, features = actions. But I'm confused what would be the batch here.
But yes, i agree with you this is not the best method for my use case!