Teschyn
Teschyn t1_j9u7s7v wrote
Reply to comment by Asmewithoutpolitics in [OC] National Divorce by the Numbers (Politics, Demographics, GDP) by tabthough
The only way to ensure that you aren't around people you disagree with is to ban them from being around you. Restricting where people live and work based off their political beliefs is deeply undemocratic.
Also, irreconcilable differences? Don't be a fucking drama queen. You can disagree with a tax plan without seceding from the union, you fucking baby.
Teschyn t1_j9tau6o wrote
I’m sorry, can we stop calling it by the cutsie name: “National Divorce”. We’re talking about talking about secession—secession for the pure reason of accumulating more political power.
Edit: spelling
Teschyn t1_iu6iyry wrote
Reply to comment by North-Right in [OC] Visualising how profitable (or how unprofitable) Amazon is by giteam
It’s about creating a monopoly. Drive normal retailers out of business with convenience and lower prices. Then once there’s no competition, they can gouge their prices with no repercussions. It’s the same strategy Walmart.
Teschyn t1_j9w1je5 wrote
Reply to comment by ZenofZer0 in [OC] National Divorce by the Numbers (Politics, Demographics, GDP) by tabthough
What differences do you feel warrants putting a border between families and friends?