TROPtastic

TROPtastic t1_jdxi9op wrote

Germany's healthcare system doesn't have a long term problem with funding. From DW:

>Germany's understaffed and over-bureaucratic hospital system, where doctors and patients have for many years complained of too many financial incentives to "over-treat" patients, has resulted in long hospital stays, unnecessary operations and unnecessary antibiotic treatments, among other things.

Aside from hiring more staff, cutting down on bureaucracy and unnecessary treatment would save money. This is of course leaving aside that €5 billion per year on Ukraine is a drop in Germany's federal budget and directly increases Germany's security.

11

TROPtastic t1_jadq7nc wrote

Be me

Make music all my life

Be jealous of Jewish composers and my Jewish patron

Write "Jewishness in Music" to "explain to ourselves the involuntary repellence possessed for us by the nature and personality of the Jews"

Double down on anti-Semitic populism

Start writing a work on "the noblest white race" "marching towards its downfall" with intermarriage with "the races it conquers"

Die

Be embraced by Nazis for my views

Get people to apologize for me and claim that my written views are fake and made up

32

TROPtastic t1_j6kp45k wrote

I suspect security concerns with our ties with China are partly behind our exclusion, although I'm not sure nuclear powered submarines would be the best choice for Canada in any case. The UK gets a pass for their Russian oligarch ties because that's just money and government influence.

7

TROPtastic t1_j6kodwr wrote

Seems like this

>Canadian political leadership have openly stated they have no desire to join AUKUS, even though their military leadership is screaming for it.

Is directly opposed by this

>US will not allow Canada to share nuclear submarine designs until it accepts the NW Passage as an international strait, same as Malacca or Hormuz

The Straits of Hormuz and Malacca are of course irrelevant here, since the shortest (desired) routes of the Northwest Passage take it through exclusively Canadian waters rather than waters shared by two nations. Comparisons to the Bosphorus and the Dardennelles straits are more appropriate.

2

TROPtastic t1_j61jiwr wrote

It's not confirmed that the Abrams will be newly-built hulls, although that may be the easiest solution. We know that conversion is possible because the US government signed a contract with GDLS to remove and replace armor on US tanks for Poland.

As /u/AllomancersAnonymous alluded to, there are export variants in service with Egypt and Saudi Arabia, but it's unknown whether the US will be able to buy tanks back from them.

1

TROPtastic t1_j60dnlo wrote

Nuclear escalation is far from inevitable, despite what Russian propagandists may say about sinking the UK under a radioactive tsunami. Russia knows that China and India won't support any nuclear use in Ukraine, and NATO is certainly not going to take in a non-member state under NATO's nuclear umbrella.

11