SurroundingAMeadow

SurroundingAMeadow t1_iw2bdzo wrote

My father-in-law comes from a long line of men sharing the same first name. His mother didn't love the trend, but respected the family wishes, so she and everybody else just called him by the nickname common for his middle name (which she otherwise would've used as his first). Now if anybody calls looking for somebody by his first name they assume it's spam because nobody who actually knows him calls him that.

2

SurroundingAMeadow t1_iw2ao4r wrote

At first I read your comment as a dark joke about unfaithful wives having kids with their deployed husband's brother, but then I realized that it makes more sense that the men who weren't deployed were naming their sons after their brothers who were deployed or killed.

Reddit has jaded me into assuming the worst in commentators.

12

SurroundingAMeadow t1_iudh7yt wrote

A former employer of mine had developed a theory he called the "50:50:90 Rule", saying that if there are two ways of doing something, you'll guess wrong 90% of the time. (It was most commonly demonstrated when hooking up hydraulic hoses) I'm no mathematician, but I think this situation would demonstrate the correlary henceforth known as the "25:25:25:25:99.9 Rule"

5